Open main menu

OrthodoxWiki β

Changes

Filioque

No change in size, 03:26, January 5, 2024
m
no edit summary
First, it is perhaps important to '''contextualize these concepts''' with a created-world example.
* When one discusses someone (say, John Doe), one might ask "what" John Doe is. " The answer would be a human being (a creature with a mind/[[nous]], a body, and a life). * If, however one asked "what" John Doe does, " that would be a different question. The answer might be running, building, teaching, etc. Note that we may often say John Doe ''is'' a runner, builder, or teacher; but such is simply a method of speaking. These attributes (all acquired through time) have no relation to what John Doe actually ''is'' (i.e. a human being). * Both of those questions, however, are different from "who" John Doe is. " The answer to "who John Doe is," is what makes John Doe different from Jim Doe (or Jane Doe, etc.). This is a specific person who distinctly uses the characteristics he/she shares with others (ex. sharing the same humanity, but also perhaps the same activity, like running).
Those (albeit in a different order below) constitute the three main methods the Orthodox use to discuss God. The confusion/non-recognition of these concepts in Western (i.e. Roman Catholic and Protestant) theology is integral to the different theologies which developed "in the West" and which underly the ''filioque''.