Difference between revisions of "Talk:Clergy awards"
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: P.S. If you have a user account, would you mind signing your posts or at least possibly signing in so that we can know who you are? --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 18:23, 8 Feb 2005 (CST) | : P.S. If you have a user account, would you mind signing your posts or at least possibly signing in so that we can know who you are? --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 18:23, 8 Feb 2005 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: I'll try and take it a step in that direction with regard to formatting, but I'm not very knowledgable in this area at all. [[User:Theophan|Theophan]] 22:25, 26 Feb 2005 (CST) |
Revision as of 04:25, February 27, 2005
The article makes little room to discuss the Greek scheme of ecclesiastical awards, and does not even elude to them. Should a separate article be written or should this one be modified to take acount of the Greek scheme?
- Methinks that this article ought to be broadened and then distinctions made between the various traditions.
- P.S. If you have a user account, would you mind signing your posts or at least possibly signing in so that we can know who you are? --Rdr. Andrew 18:23, 8 Feb 2005 (CST)
- I'll try and take it a step in that direction with regard to formatting, but I'm not very knowledgable in this area at all. Theophan 22:25, 26 Feb 2005 (CST)