Difference between revisions of "User talk:FrJohn"
(Link buttons) |
m (→Link buttons) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Link buttons == | == Link buttons == | ||
| − | Fr., the first one is link-button size, but the second is more banner-sized, and rather illegible when reduced to the size of the first. Still want the second? {{User:Magda/sig}} 12:08, November 25, 2005 (CST) | + | Fr., the [http://www.flickr.com/photos/magdalainn/13560522/ first one] is link-button size, but the [http://www.flickr.com/photos/magdalainn/13445237/ second] is more banner-sized, and rather illegible when reduced to the size of the first. Still want the second? You're welcome to both, of course. {{User:Magda/sig}} 12:08, November 25, 2005 (CST) |
Revision as of 18:09, November 25, 2005
Welcome to my discussion page. Please post new messages to the bottom of the page and use headings when starting new discussion topics.
Please also sign and date your entries by inserting - ~~~~ at the end. Thank you.
Start a new discussion topic.
/archived discussion 1 (through 09-07-2005)
/archived discussion 2 (through 11-20-2005)
Interwiki
Father, would it be okay to get rid of some of these? For instance, the AndStuff wiki is personal and closed. For many of these, it's doubtful that we would ever link them, let alone in quantities enough to justify having an interwiki link (LinuxWiki, for example). On the other hand, it may be easier to keep them than weed them out. Additionally, some of the interwiki links do not link to wikis, like those related to Google. Your thoughts? —magda (talk) 13:06, November 21, 2005 (CST)
Favicon License
Father, That license for the favicon was for the favicon that I created. If you read the log, I think HappyGrievling replaced it with a favicon of his version. He just didn't change the license.
OrthodoxWiki:Buzz
Father, I thought you might be interested in this link which I found last night. —magda (talk) 09:23, November 24, 2005 (CST)
Link buttons
Fr., the first one is link-button size, but the second is more banner-sized, and rather illegible when reduced to the size of the first. Still want the second? You're welcome to both, of course. —magda (talk) 12:08, November 25, 2005 (CST)
