Template talk:Orthodoxyinaustralasia

What would you think about compressing this template, as was recently done with Template:Orthodoxyinamerica? Perhaps the lists of monasteries and bishops could be turned into one general link connecting to a list article for each. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew ^talk contribs (THINK!)]] 10:05, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT)

i like the idea, but the problem is deciding what should be included and what shouldn't be...australasia being so small and all. particularly the bishops list - there's, like, 8 bishops. perhaps getting rid of the auxillery ones? shrinking the monastery list somewhat would be good (and easier); perhaps listing the major monasteries as well. i'll do that now, let me know what you think. oea 22:34, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT)

The list of bishops could include all bishops that have historically served in Australasia, which I'm sure would be more than eight. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew ^talk contribs (THINK!)]] 23:43, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT)

oops! only just saw this, sorry! what do you think about the way it is now? Pistevo 19:46, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Macedonian

Similar to the Talk:Orthodoxy in Australasia thing: should we list the Macedonian Diocese? Keeping in mind that, if we do, every other group that calls itself Orthodox must be listed. — by Pιsτévο ^{talk complaints} at 23:00, May 22, 2006 (CDT)

I think it would be better to stick with the Mainstream-Chalcedonian Bias (cf. OrthodoxWiki:Style Manual (Churches)). As far as I can tell, that would mean not listing the Macedonian Diocese in the template. —magda (talk) 09:49, May 23, 2006 (CDT)