renameuser, Administrators
5,600
edits
Changes
no edit summary
:: For that reason, sentence states: ''"based on understanding of the '''certain Orthodox''', who '''see work of [[Vladimir Lossky|Prof. Lossky]] as contemporary synthesis of the patristic theology'''"''. I think it is clearly explained, why and under what condition, article of Mr. Leithart is seen by ''"certain Orthodox"'' as criticism, unintentional though, but, still criticism. [[User:Cebactokpatop|Cebactokpatop]] 13:14, May 5, 2008 (UTC)
:::Sad irony: such a viewpoint of Lossky isn't Orthodox. We do not take any one author as being perfect, theologically or otherwise - which explains how Staniloae can disagree with Lossky and yet not be thrown out of the Church. The question is whether the article ''is'' critical, not whether it can be misinterpreted into criticism. — by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 19:30, May 5, 2008 (UTC)
