Difference between revisions of "Talk:Western Sahara"
(→Why?) |
(→Why?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: So it seems to me, too. —[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 05:04, April 10, 2007 (PDT) | : So it seems to me, too. —[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 05:04, April 10, 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | ::'''Fair enough''' I figured that you would want to have articles on all of the countries of the world, if for no other reason than getting rid of red links... [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] 14:05, April 26, 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:05, April 26, 2007
Why?
Does it seem superfluous to anyone to have an article stating that no churches exist in a region? Shouldn't it be deleted? Gabriela 21:12, April 9, 2007 (PDT)
- So it seems to me, too. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 05:04, April 10, 2007 (PDT)
- Fair enough I figured that you would want to have articles on all of the countries of the world, if for no other reason than getting rid of red links... Koavf 14:05, April 26, 2007 (PDT)
