Difference between revisions of "User talk:Joe Rodgers"
(Talk pages) |
Joe Rodgers (talk | contribs) (Replied to question) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Talk pages == | == Talk pages == | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
(Please forgive me if I seem needling and nagging.) —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 17:47, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT) | (Please forgive me if I seem needling and nagging.) —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 17:47, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I will gladly abide by the decision of the sysops. What is everyone else's opinion? I talked with another sysop (I won't mention their name) who seemed to agree that things get a little cluttered, cloudy, or outdated in discussion pages. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : My own thoughts are that if articles can be trimmed and made more concise, why can't talk pages? I like having an archive, but if a situation has been addressed then I personally think it makes things cluttered to keep them around. The discussion is archived in the changelog. My two cents. --[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 18:54, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:54, June 28, 2005
Talk pages
I don't much mind what you do with your own Talk page, but would you mind not erasing those of other articles? It's helpful to see where we've been and why we've done what we've done.
(Please forgive me if I seem needling and nagging.) —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 17:47, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- I will gladly abide by the decision of the sysops. What is everyone else's opinion? I talked with another sysop (I won't mention their name) who seemed to agree that things get a little cluttered, cloudy, or outdated in discussion pages.
- My own thoughts are that if articles can be trimmed and made more concise, why can't talk pages? I like having an archive, but if a situation has been addressed then I personally think it makes things cluttered to keep them around. The discussion is archived in the changelog. My two cents. --Joe Rodgers 18:54, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
