Difference between revisions of "User talk:Pistevo/Archive 06"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
BTW, for future reference, you can do a move onto an existing redirect without deleting the target article first.  (I just tested this to make sure I remembered correctly.)  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 15:15, May 31, 2006 (CDT)
 
BTW, for future reference, you can do a move onto an existing redirect without deleting the target article first.  (I just tested this to make sure I remembered correctly.)  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 15:15, May 31, 2006 (CDT)
 
== G.O. N.Z. ==
 
 
Nope.  Haven't heard anything about it.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 20:07, June 6, 2006 (CDT)
 
 
: I got the email now.  (My email was down yesterday.)  It doesn't make much sense to me, though.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 07:47, June 7, 2006 (CDT)
 
 
== Serbian Bishops in Australia ==
 
 
I'm not quite sure what needs to be changed in these succession boxes.  Would you mind?
 
*[[Sava (Juric) of Slavonia]]
 
*[[Luka of Western Europe]]
 
—[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 11:52, June 9, 2006 (CDT)
 
 
== Pelikan ==
 
 
Yes, I am almost positive that the history books were written before he became Orthodox. I believe the last book was published in 1989 and he converted in 1998. [[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe]] 2006-06-14
 
 
: Yep, this is right.  The vast majority of his works were written before he came into the Church.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 20:20, June 14, 2006 (CDT)
 

Revision as of 09:08, June 15, 2006

Magda Picture

I fixed the picture...it should be ok to repost it now to her page. --Patriarchanthony 01:01, January 8, 2006 (CST) BTW...You are restoring the spammers pages. Not the real ones. Look at the recent changes for yesterday and see that the FR. John and MAgda pages are uneffected by your edits... --Patriarchanthony 01:03, January 8, 2006 (CST)

I guess not! Sad, really Sad! --Patriarchanthony 01:15, January 8, 2006 (CST)

misinformation

(1) I strenuously object to false information being again re-posted to this article. Bishop Germain was not deposed by Romania. I was in Paris when the news came from Romania. I received a copy of the official letter to the clergy and faithful of the Church of France. He was not put on trial and he was not deposed. Merely asserting something doesn't make it true. I at least have the advantage of having been there and of having read the official communications. (2) This article repeats the misinformation that Alexis van der Mensbrugghe belonged to the French Church but then returned to the Church of Russia. This is not true. He simply remained when the Russian Church after the French left in order to maintain their Western character. (3) The use of the term "canonical limbo" is not appropriate. Being canonical has to do with living in accordance with the canons. It is not a matter of being recognized by someone else. A useful article on this is the classic one by Fr Alexander Schmemann. --Fr Lev 20:56, March 2, 2006 (CST)

Copyrights

Hi Pistevo,

I could be wrong, but my understanding is that use of logos and publicity photos constitute fair use. Wikipedia has special templates for these, which we've adopted -- see OrthodoxWiki:Templates for options. Thanks, Fr. John

Code

I noticed the 'Orthodox code' on the template portion of your user page - where does one find that? Ari 23:31, March 26, 2006 (CST)

HOCNA article

Bravo on ironing out and combining elements in this article! It's a difficult subject. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 06:46, May 5, 2006 (CDT)

Saints' quotes

Greetings Pistevo, I also have many other saints' quotes archived at User:Arbible/Qutotations, if these could be of any help to you. Yours in Christ, --Arbible 07:46, May 13, 2006 (CDT)

Nicolas Mansour

I can't quite figure out the dates in the succession template... —magda (talk) 10:07, May 23, 2006 (CDT)

Moving

BTW, for future reference, you can do a move onto an existing redirect without deleting the target article first. (I just tested this to make sure I remembered correctly.) —Dcn. Andrew talk random contribs 15:15, May 31, 2006 (CDT)