|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | *[[User talk:Magda/Archive001|Archive 1]]
| |
| − | *[[User talk:Magda/Archive002|Archive 2]]
| |
| − | ----
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Nativity series ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Sounds great, but what did you have in mind? (Or were you hoping I'd provide that?) :) {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 14:24, December 23, 2005 (CST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == V's Cardbox ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Could we imply that you are endorsing/advising readers to buy with confidence from these suppliers? (There are many more, but I am not sure what the rules are? Do they need to pay to you first to be listed?). ER
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == [[New Martyrs]] ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I'm actively putting together a separate article at this moment! :) {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 15:35, January 3, 2006 (CST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Searching ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Yeah, I've noticed that sort of thing before, too, both here and on Wikipedia. I don't understand it. :/ {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 08:40, January 4, 2006 (CST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Categorizing hierarchs ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I don't completely understand all the options you gave, but...
| |
| − |
| |
| − | My preference is for there to be individual articles titled "List of Xes of Y," where "Xes" is the highest rank for that see, e.g., [[List of Patriarchs of Constantinople]] which lists all bishops of Byzantium/Constantinople, no matter their rank. The category would be included in all articles about those bishops, and the "List of" article would also be included in the category. {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 19:28, January 5, 2006 (CST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :''Your patent answers (which I never seem to think of) are why I keep asking you questions.''
| |
| − | : And here I thought that I was just a curmudgeon who liked things his own way. :) {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 10:54, January 6, 2006 (CST)
| |
