Difference between revisions of "User talk:Joe Rodgers"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (→‎Talk pages)
 
(53 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
== Talk pages ==
+
== [[Deanery]] ==
  
−
I don't much mind what you do with your own Talk page, but would you mind not erasing those of other articles?  It's helpful to see where we've been and why we've done what we've done.   
+
Were you aware that your source (La Crosse) is Roman Catholic?  I don't know whether it makes any difference in the definition of a deanery, but I thought I should point it out anyway.  {{User:Magda/sig}} 07:41, January 19, 2006 (CST)
  
−
(Please forgive me if I seem needling and nagging.)  —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 17:47, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
+
:Yes I was. I am certainly not against Catholic, Protestant, or anything for that matter, when it coincides with truth. I was not able to find a reasonable online source from an Orthodox perspective and thought that these words were appropriate for Orthodox deaneries as well. [[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe]] 20060119
  
−
: I will gladly abide by the decision of the sysops. What is everyone else's opinion? I talked with another sysop (I won't mention their name) who seemed to agree that things get a little cluttered, cloudy, or outdated in discussion pages.
+
== Pic ==
  
−
: My own thoughts are that if articles can be trimmed and made more concise, why can't talk pages? I like having an archive, but if a situation has been addressed then I personally think it makes things cluttered to keep them around. The discussion is archived in the changelog/history. My two cents. --[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 18:54, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
+
Nice to see you Joe! {{User:FrJohn/sig}}
  
−
Wikipedia's usual approach (not that we have to do everything they do) is to make archival subpages when the given talk page gets too long. Sorting through a history can be extremely difficult and time consuming, especially if one isn't looking for something in particular but rather simply wants to know what the discussion regarding a given article has been.
+
And you know, somehow I thought you were older than you appear to be.  :)  {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 16:39, January 19, 2006 (CST)
  
−
I don't think this has ever been discussed between the sysops. I'm just ''one'' of them and by no means chief among them. We can certainly put it up for discussion, though, which I've done on [[OrthodoxWiki:Administrators]].  —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 19:09, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
+
== Menologion ==
 +
Joe, this is Aleks. I got you message recently. Can you elaborate in an e-mail on what exactly you're interested in making? I think it would be great to have Menologion and OW work together, but I want to figure out the logistics first.
 +
 
 +
== Hi ==
 +
Dear Joe, Thanks (belatedly) for your welcome note!
 +
Best, [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 12:39, June 28, 2006 (CDT)
 +
 
 +
== Your sig ==
 +
 
 +
I've noticed that your sig isn't coming out quite right when you sign posts.  If you want to use the template approach, you'll need to check the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box in your preferences on the "User profile" tab.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 15:23, August 10, 2006 (CDT)
 +
 
 +
== IRC Channel still up? ==
 +
 
 +
Hi Joe,
 +
 
 +
I just checked up on the IRC channel and I received the following messages:
 +
:ChanServ changed this room to require operator status to change the topic. (11:46AM)<br>
 +
[11:46AM] ChanServ made this room no longer a secret. (11:46AM) <br>
 +
[11:46AM] You were demoted from operator by ChanServ. (11:46AM) <br>
 +
 
 +
Given my IRC inexperience, maybe this is nothing to worry about - just normal, but I wanted to make sure our channel is still up and running in good standing, not quashed due to inactivity. What is the freenode policy on this?
 +
 
 +
Thanks! — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk]) 09:49, May 26, 2007 (PDT)
 +
 
 +
== Active appeal ==
 +
 
 +
There's currently an active appeal over at [[OrthodoxWiki talk:Administrators]]. If as an admin, you would like to participate, please feel free to do so.  Thanks! &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 16:01, August 19, 2008 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Hi, I'm Italian ==
 +
 
 +
I hope in Orthodox in Italian... i'll writing in Italian... about Ortodossia!!

Latest revision as of 13:25, January 19, 2011

Deanery

Were you aware that your source (La Crosse) is Roman Catholic? I don't know whether it makes any difference in the definition of a deanery, but I thought I should point it out anyway. —magda (talk) 07:41, January 19, 2006 (CST)

Yes I was. I am certainly not against Catholic, Protestant, or anything for that matter, when it coincides with truth. I was not able to find a reasonable online source from an Orthodox perspective and thought that these words were appropriate for Orthodox deaneries as well. Joe 20060119

Pic

Nice to see you Joe! — FrJohn (talk)

And you know, somehow I thought you were older than you appear to be.  :) —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 16:39, January 19, 2006 (CST)

Menologion

Joe, this is Aleks. I got you message recently. Can you elaborate in an e-mail on what exactly you're interested in making? I think it would be great to have Menologion and OW work together, but I want to figure out the logistics first.

Hi

Dear Joe, Thanks (belatedly) for your welcome note! Best, Maxim 12:39, June 28, 2006 (CDT)

Your sig

I've noticed that your sig isn't coming out quite right when you sign posts. If you want to use the template approach, you'll need to check the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box in your preferences on the "User profile" tab. —Dcn. Andrew talk random contribs 15:23, August 10, 2006 (CDT)

IRC Channel still up?

Hi Joe,

I just checked up on the IRC channel and I received the following messages:

ChanServ changed this room to require operator status to change the topic. (11:46AM)

[11:46AM] ChanServ made this room no longer a secret. (11:46AM)
[11:46AM] You were demoted from operator by ChanServ. (11:46AM)

Given my IRC inexperience, maybe this is nothing to worry about - just normal, but I wanted to make sure our channel is still up and running in good standing, not quashed due to inactivity. What is the freenode policy on this?

Thanks! — FrJohn (talk) 09:49, May 26, 2007 (PDT)

Active appeal

There's currently an active appeal over at OrthodoxWiki talk:Administrators. If as an admin, you would like to participate, please feel free to do so. Thanks! —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 16:01, August 19, 2008 (UTC)


Hi, I'm Italian

I hope in Orthodox in Italian... i'll writing in Italian... about Ortodossia!!

Retrieved from "https://orthodoxwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Joe_Rodgers&oldid=97425"