User talk:Ixthis888

From OrthodoxWiki
Revision as of 02:27, May 14, 2009 by ASDamick (talk | contribs) (Minor edits)
Jump to: navigation, search

If you want to "talk" you can email me via this link Special:Emailuser/Ixthis888.


Vasiliki, thank you for your kind note. I tend to be history buff - so I like to look behind the fluff of tradition (small t) get a picture of what "really" happened. Bill/Basil/Vasily. Wsk 20:31, January 20, 2009 (UTC)

Minor edits

I've noticed you've recently made a huge number of edits all marked as "minor." Please remember that "minor" edits are things like fixing spelling, minor formatting issues, fixing links, etc. Adding content is almost never minor. This may seem pedantic, but it's actually pretty important, since many folks filter what they see in edit histories so that they don't see minor edits.

For more info, check this out: w:Help:Minor edit. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 21:05, May 12, 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I kinda thought that but the fact that I modify every 30 seconds I thought on the other hand people would be annoyed with me if the same article came up a zillion times in the Recent Changes list ..its not a problem ..I can do it the (pedantic) way :-) Vasiliki 21:47, May 12, 2009 (UTC)

Well, perhaps you might also want to consider proofreading and incorporating all your intended edits before you hit "save."  :) —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 13:11, May 13, 2009 (UTC)
With all respect (and I know you are cheeky enough to get it), when people give up their personal time to contribute and help it would be nice if their was a *tiny* amount of gratitude and courtesy for their assistance rather than this continual "nit-pick" at things that really are not that important! "proof reading" is valid in context of article (agree and I should do it more often! :P) however in context of a "timeline" its too hard ... I am amazed Angellight888 does so well but he is used to that whole --- pages of text in front of his face and probably can handle it much better than me. I also have to contend with "timing out" after a certain amount of time ... and losing anything in my edit altogether ... so, fair go Father - yesterday there was no such thing as Timeline of History for Britain and today there is) so I will be more obedient to the best of my abilities!! <-- aussie slang. Vasiliki 23:13, May 13, 2009 (UTC)
THANK YOU. There's some gratitude for you.
(Now, since we're writing an encyclopedia, can we please recommence the nit-picking?) —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 02:27, May 14, 2009 (UTC)