<div class="boilerplate" id="stub" style="margin: 0 auto; text-align: center; background: #EEEEEE; padding: 0 10px; border: 1px solid #CCC; width: 60%; align: center">'''Fr. Andrew''' is currently taking a '''reserving the right to make his wiki-break''' to attend to the business of moving to another state, so he may only be sporadically available and generally fairly inactive. Please remember him in your prayerscontributions extremely sporadic.</div>

Congratulations ==Vandalism 10June08==Figured just after I did it... :/ ...Wonder if there's a way to you both! We are expecting our little baby girl in midhave a setting where all of an editors edits can just be mass-October 2006. We might have to swap tips! reverted? &mdash; by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] ^{''[[Usertalk:Joe RodgersPistevo|&#123;&#123;<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[Usertalk:Joe RodgersPistevo/sig}}dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]] 23''} at 11:4856, August 5June 10, 2006 2008 (CDTUTC)

Dear ASDamick* Thank you very much,Fr. Andrew. It's just my duty.--''[[User:Θεοδωρος|<span style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: #082567">Θεόδωρος</span>]]'' 12:02, June 10, 2008 (UTC)

Thank I've noticed you for your recent changes are able to delete particular edits from the article on revision history. I think [[Basil Pope Saint Dioscorus I of Alexandria (OsborneCoptic POV) of Amphipolis]]. still needs help (or just to be transferred to OrthodoxSource and deleted here), but I'm glad d like to see us working on this text together. I would like know how to see it accurately delete selected edits, and dispassionately reflect what the full state of affairs surrounding this bishop"undo" button does ... without harming an actual article. I think that most of your revisions to my recent update of the text have been very helpful - again—[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 19:47, June 11, my many thanks for them.2008 (UTC)

A few points that :Thank you. I think still need some further considerationhadn't even noticed the (show/hide) link until you pointed it out. —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 22:15, June 11, 2008 (UTC)

* ''Title:'' The title 'Bishop of Amphipolis' is contested, and highly controversial:Hmm. It Poking it doesn't seem appropriate for the OrthodoxWiki article on the bishop to take a definitive side one way or the other on work in this mattercase. I had altered can rollback to the text previous edit, or I can undo, but each option seems to address thisdeal with single edits, which you refined nicelywhen I want to go back several edits. I have tried several times to copy and paste from an [http://orthodoxwiki.org/index. Howeverphp?title=Pope_Saint_Dioscorus_I_of_Alexandria_(Coptic_POV)&oldid=60734 older edit], but I do think it appopriate that there may be too much data. I feel uncomfortable transferring this article to OrthodoxSource, because I don't know whether we have the issue is left relatively open, by simply referring right to him as 'Bishop Basil' in use most cases of the material from this article (emost of it seems to be from [http://www.gcoptichymns. in the caption under the photographnet/module-library-viewpub-tid-1-pid-384.html this article]). The title of In any case, if you can get the article gives him the title 'Bishop of Amphipolis' alreadyrestored (I give up), which points things in a certain reading; but I think we need to be wary it needs a significant amount of giving 'our own blessing' to a matter that is disputed amongst the patriarchatescleanup.—[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 22:52, June 11, 2008 (UTC)

* ''Nature of the bishop's retirement:'' I've corrected the paragraph == Help on the nature of the bishop's forced retirement. This was not made because he sought reception in the EP, but because he sought to do so preemptorily, without canonical release and order.Code ==

* ''Title in summary box:'' In line with my point above on the bishop's titleHi, I think it is only fair / accurate to return the small footnote qualifier on the title in the summary box at have looked through the bottom. Not various Help Files but there doesnt seem to do so seems be one that teaches you (or define) how to claim, in use the article, that the matter is disputed parameters (and open, only to go what these are) for code. I have been working on in the summary information putting a {{ }} together but I want to present it as collapse my table. Do you know of a closed/decided issue. reference I think in fairness cna read to the actual situation, educate myself on this small flag is warranted code? and not in itself a bias (cf. for example the summary boxes what will work on autocephalous churches on WikipediaOrthodoxWiki? [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 02:58, June 12, where a small asterisk is used next to churches whose autocephaly is disputed by some2008 (UTC).

I've made edits to :Do you know if the article this morning {{#if:}} are supposed to account for the above points; I hope they're in general things you approve of (I've made them as separate edits, so you can see the progression).work on OrthodoxWiki? They work on Wikipedia -- [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]]

''"So, who should I'm currently in the lead and hoping I hit 10recruit??? See,000 firstmy development so far .. (There's probably no prize, though.)"'':I think we should throw a party. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]::Seen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof want someone to work with! Any ideas? [[User:FrJohnIxthis888|Fr. JohnVasiliki]]

==Bp [[Thomas (Joseph) of Oakland]]==Thanks for responding to the issue on my talk page; I fear that, in the mood I was in, my response would have been somewhat less than an exhibition of perfect charitytake a look .... &mdash; edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] ^{''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''} at 07:13, August 14, 2006 (CDT)

The bullet lists in [[Byzantine response ==Existing structure==Thanks on the revert on my addition to the "graduates". I like to OCA autocephaly]]: Are they simply listing every single argument made by follow the Byzantine churches against OCA autocephaly? Because existing structure a best I can. A few times I've noted what appears to be more than one path, usually over using similar titles for articles and categories that I think adds confusion in navigating. At this one really boggles the mind:time I can't remember my "examples!" * Moscow's act Multiple paths may be necessary sometime, but my intent is an attempt to extend Soviet influence into Americawork within the present structure and keep the structure simple to follow. "[[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 14:09, June 18, 2008 (UTC)

This was perhaps tossed out by someone, somewhere, at some time, in an effort to amass as many objections as possible==PSCA==PSCA = "Provisional Supreme Church Authority [of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad]", but it clearly has no bearing whatsoever on aka the current state of affairs (as "Agathangelites" -- the rest of the article appears latest schismatic jurisdiction to)emerge in Ukraine. I'm not going to edit it quit yet (since you put it in there), but ll get a footnote or an external link might be appropriatebrief article about them up. Otherwise, it's completely spurious except as a historical curiosity which has clearly proven to be laughable.--[[User:Basil{{unsigned|Basil]] 16:16, August 14, 2006 (CDT)Aleks}}

:==Stuff==1. I agree that documentation would be helpful. Historical arguments would be useful am not trying to keep live in'''"bubble" world''' where only I can edit and only I can do as I please ... so, as they do give some perspective on the historical relations between the two jurisdictionsplease dont go inferring that I should "bugger off" and start my own wiki if that is what I want .. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]

==Return==A nice2. I am not upset because you deleted the DVD articles, subtle change or Category links (because I make OW mistakes) I never said that so please dont infer that has not gone unnoticed. I look forward am/was upset with the overall revert you made to your inactive partication! — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] the OrthodoxSource Main Page. That was a significant ([http://wwwrv) and I just would have liked the opportunity to have been treated like an equal in that case - drop me a conversational note giving me a warning that you intend to do it.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk])That was what upset me, ''''the fact you didnt think I was worth discussing it in the first place'''

Welcome back, Deacon Andrew3. I missed your discipline tend to get defensive with you because from Day One you have been pretty abrupt with me on keeping a consistent format for just about every occassion ... so that pattern has made me feel like '''you dont think I am worth discussing with in the first place''' - even if you do talk to me ... it has been talking "down" on occassions, little comments in the articlespast "highlighting" my weaknesses have made me feel inferior . .. and have made me feel that everyone has a superior grasp of "English", I mean this sincerely as dont ... so ... I looked forward do note, that you are so willing to your catching my be "typospatient". It had kept with me on the ; Wow, how awesome that you can exhibit ''patience'ball' but I still needed a with me? how good editor. [[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 13:57, October 9, 2006 (CDT)does that make me feel?

==Congrats==It doesnt matter. The point is, I see dont seem to do it right in here. So, goodbye from today. I wont contribute to OW anymore if you signed your last contribution all think that my contributions lack 'quality"Father Andrew." Congratulations on your ordination! , what is the point of wasting my time and yours? - [[User:GabrielaIxthis888|GabrielaVasiliki]] 2204:3152, October 30June 19, 2006 2008 (CSTUTC)

: See my response on your [[User talk:Ixthis888|talk page]]. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color= corrupted letters "green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 05:00, June 19, 2008 (UTC)

:AFAIK, this I want to apologise for coming across (in written text) as such a cry baby ... I guarantee you I get frustrated that I can not explain myself simply and quickly and appropriately and I know you are a cool priest but I do get upset on big ticket items because all i want is a known issue with an upgrade the opportunity to MySQL 5discuss ... In any case, accept my apologies for going all huffy yesterday. I'm still stand by the fact I will not enough of contribute to OW any longer since I feel that I am a nuisance rather than a whiz help. However, in OS I really do want to fix contribute to developing the problemframework/skeleton (ie. Set up all the codes and the worksheets) that can then be "filled" with the revelant Bibliographical lists by others (or even me). To do that, and I really need someone to talk with over in the OS wiki. At the damage is minimalmoment, so we'll have I want to do it manuallydiscuss a framework for Liturgical Texts (BEFORE) I go ahead and set up the entire code/framework .... Sorry! — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] (Can you help me? [http://www.orthodoxwikiorthodoxsource.org/User_talkOrthodoxSource:Discussion DESIGN of Liturgical Text Portal] - [[User:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talkIxthis888|Vasiliki]]00:35, June 20, 2008 (UTC)

Hi dear Father, I was leaving off the extra interwiki links for the Mian page until the additional localizations are ready for "Beta" stage, by which I mean that all the necessary documents have been translated... The == Estonian "releaseIssue" stage will then be when there are strong enough communities and moderation around these wikis to really launch them - i.e content and spam problems are dealt with quickly. — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk])

==Metaxakis entry==Father: Evlogeite! Regarding your comments about the Estonian Church. You write:Dear Father"The reason for the difference in naming is that the EP's Estonian church is not regarded by the EP as a constituent part—rather, the EP regards the Estonian church as autonomous, having the same status as Finland, Sinai, etc. The MP, however, regards its Estonian church as being essentially an integral part of the MP, in contrast with the Church of Ukraine, which it regards as autonomous. Thus,the distinction." Thank you for pointing out Please explain to me, what the difference in status is between the Ukrainian and Estonian Churches (MP). It seems to me that both have the same status within the MP. The Primate of the Ukrainian Church is confirmed by the Moscow Patriarch; so is the Primate of the Estonian Church (MP). Hierarchs of the Ukrainian Church serve in the Council and Synod of the Russian Church; so do hierarchs of the Estonian Church (MP). In fact, the Metropolitan of Kiev is an ex officio permanent member of the Holy Synod in Moscow. The Ukrainian Church receives its chrism from the Moscow Patriarch; so does the Estonian Church (MP). The name of the issues Patriarch of NPOV Moscow is elevated at services in the Ukrainian Church and MCB with in the Estonian Church before the names of the last edit Metropolitans of Kiev and Tallinn, respectively. Thus, I had enteredsee no difference between their status as "integral parts of the MP" or not. Of course I agree with having those standards do not know what the status of the Estonian Church (EP) is within the EP. However, it seems to me that, for matters of OrthodoxWiki: 1. If the Ukrainian Church is listed as an encylopedic entry autonomous church with unrecognized autonomy in the box of autonomous / autocephalous churches, so too should be the Estonian Church (MP), alongside the Estonian Church (EP). This is already happening on the French version of the project. 2. There should be two articles. One called "Church of Estonia (EP)" and I would like one called "Church of Estonia (MP)". The article "Church of Estonia" ought to see be a disambiguation page. Doing otherwise may be construed as taking sides in a better product along canonical debate. Yours in Christ, --[[User:Aleks|Aleks]] 15:56, June 23, 2008 (UTC): Done --[[User:Adeosja|Adeosja]] 16:46, August 15, 2009 (UTC) == New Article - '''[[Georgii Shavelsky]]''' == '''Hi, when you have the time, could you please create his Biography - [[Georgii Shavelsky]] - to compliment the lines osource Memoir you suggestcreate? I have cut and paste a really bad "Google" translation of a biography I found from the 'source', see below. ... However I do have not read or understand Russian so there is no way I can edit the google translation for accuracy of information bc I can not cross check it with the authentic material in the Russian language. I created a few comments if i mayOrthodoxSource article to link the Memoir you created, please visit [[osource:Author:Georgii Shavelsky]] to link the OW article and also modify the osource article.''' - [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 01:22, June 26, 2008 (UTC) * I feel Source: [http://209.85.171.104/translate_c?hl=en&sl=ru&u=http://militera.lib.ru/memo/russian/shavelsky_gi/pre.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DShavelsky%26hl%3Den]----Life, identity and fate of his father George Shavelski represents an unusually coherent whole. Since their memories of. George starts only in 1911, when he received the appointment as military and maritime Protopresvitera clergy, Publisher them. Chekhov is experiencing living need to give readers a better understanding of the life of this exceptional man and a prominent cleric.  George O. Shavelsky was born on January 6, 1871 in the village Dubokray Vitebsk province, in the family dyachka that heavy peasant labour extractive piece of bread for his large family. Primary education has received in the future Protopresbyter Duhovnom College and then graduated from the first course Theological Seminary. Ahead holds the promise of higher education in the Theological Academy. But on. George has chosen to dedicate themselves to serving ordinary people, and in 1891 was appointed psalomshchika very poor parish of Vitebsk province. Here at the same time, and he became a teacher in rural schools. Four years later, he took the San priesthood and was appointed rector in his native village of another province. Two years later, his wife died, leaving him two-year-old girl. However, Father Georgy not fallen spirit, wholeheartedly commend pastoral work. Soon, on the recommendation of the bishop of Vitebsk, about. George was sent to St. Petersburg for the substance admission of what Spiritual Academy. He brilliantly stood the entrance examination and immediately allocate as the best student of the Academy. [6]  As far back as when his student, about. George was written appointed preacher at the Alexandrovsky Engineering Plant and decent in the name of Grand Duke Dmitry Konstantinovich in Strelna. As a student 3 - course, he became rector Suvorovskoy church.  When broke out Russian- Japanese war, about . George volunteered to go to the agenda front and received the appointment in the army regimental first priest, then divisional decent, mostly at the end of the priest Manchu armies. For his outstanding leadership and exceptional prowess (the risk to the life he visited the front line, where once suffered severe concussion), about. George was elevated to the rank of archpriest of St. and awarded honors. And St. George. Vladimir with swords.  In March 1906 on. George returned to his pastoral ministry in Suvorovskoy Church in St. Petersburg. In addition to pastoral service, Fr. Georgy very early borrowed teaching activity. Since 1906 - till 1910 - the year he was zakonouchitelem in Smolny Institute, a professor of theology in 1910 Historical Studies Institute. In the same in 1910 about. George became a member of the Pan Orthodox Congress military spiritual Protopresbyter. The next in 1911, about. George was appointed Protopresbyter military and maritime clergy Russian Empire.  Events shook Russia's first revolution of 1923 1904- actually 5. heightened public interest Church circles to religious education officers and soldiers. O. George was accurate the initiator of special institutions for officers theological readings. His lectures always been a huge success. At the initiative on. George, such readings have been organized in Moscow, Kiev, Kharkov and unbiased; after all history is historyKazan garrisons.  Even before the start 1 - World War II, in the first period [7] his protopresviterstva (1911-1914's.) About. George has totally restructured and if those were greatly raise the subjects that were tabled at that congressmilitary and especially maritime clergy, it is attracted a matter number of history prominent clerics. It should be noted, and emphasize his ability and the ability to select a very important matter talented assistants and keep firmly in their hands, those, different abilities were not always at a height in nature. From the clergy subordinate to him, he demanded thateveryone worked fully its forces and capabilities, but will certainly worked; negligent and stroptivyh he pursued and expelled. His kipuchey energy and skill to come to any good and useful case and bring it to the end, as well as their availability, responsiveness and willingness to come to the aid of everyone in need, he earned the love, respect and information trust him in a subordinate of about 5,000 people (during the war) clergy, which every Orthodox Christian today in 1917 at its All-Russian congress elected him his life Protopresbyter.  By the end of July 1914. George has prepared a right draft name to be informed the highest total reorganization of management and aware maritime military clergy. To carry out his he was not given. Gryanula war. George O. received the appointment in Stavku High-Chief. Further story ofhis life and work on. Im sure you agree that George tells himself to simply list the items attention of readers memoir. After the agenda end of civil war. George moved to Bulgaria. Here he first became an ordinary priest. Outstanding ability and talent on the bright predicant. George was soon rated as the Bulgarian church authorities and local universities. George O. was brought to the pedagogical work first as a teacher Sophia University, then as they werea professor of Theological [8], isFaculty of Sofia University, while he was zakonouchitelem and director of Russian grammar school.  George O. and was destined to survive the Second World War. I think is a neutral approach ''(iHe died rather quietly ugas 2 - October 1951.e Despite the fact that the death of Fr. "here is what what was proposed in 1923: 1 George could not inform all his friends, 2relatives and acquaintances, 3the news of the death of Fr. George razneslas with lightning speed, 4not only for Sofia,but also for the province. The funeral on. George attracted a huge number of people simply wanted to ashes beloved pastor and mentor.etc Outstanding organizational skills, teaching skills, independence of judgement, faithful to their convictions, combined in fact seven changes on. Georgia with remarkable humility in allhis personal life and habits. This modesty especially stay invisible when compared with the breadth of its aid near and far. These qualities about.)'' Not sure how else to word that part George Shavelskogo served as a source of itlegends, it which is what it is; some subjects such still in his lifetime became folded around his behalf.---- == The Reason You Make the Big Bucks == Fr. Andrew, as this particular exampleI noted on the main moderator page, may not be neutral in themselvesthe Liturgy of St. Tikhon article needs moderation -- more than you provided. I'm offended at being equated with my attacker, and for us to attempt had you bothered to make them so or omit them risks read the error bulk of creating our own modern bias insteadthe post, you'd note I more than presented a risk every historian is aware ofthorough case for why my edits improved the article. The writing of history must IMO, the word "almost" should be impartialstruck from the record, whether but the historical facts in themselves are or arent impartial last time this same poster started three simultaneous edit-wars with me (Feb. 12-14), you threatened to ban us is another matterboth if we ever did it again. (There I agree that the source timeline that am getting blamed for ''responding'' again.) So, to avoid being banned by you, I located 'm asking you to do the information on would be NPOV/MCBmoderator's job, however as for read the background material about how the information AWRV has implemented all these in itselfactual fact (which you probably know already), it is either factual and (if you're convinced) strike the word "almost" from the article (or if not, let us know why not). You're a moderator, and I'm tired of being blamed for responding -- so have at it is isn't . :) --[[User:Willibrord|Willibrord]] 03:32, June 28, 2008 (fabricatedUTC):Thanks.I know how busy you must be with PLC coming up, but I appreciate your looking things over.--[[User:Willibrord|Willibrord]] 22:56, June 28, 2008 (UTC) Deacon Ben got in trouble for "responding"? He deleted an entire article of mine.(I put it back :) ) BTW, Father Andrew, THANK YOU for being objective and noting that a page titled "Western Rite and Old Calendarists" was about the Western Rite and Old Calendarists.in other words there I would love to review what "Willibrord" was no editing or personal opinions presented with "confirming"-- forgive my presumption but the man has an agenda. I wish I had the exact quote of Patriarch Elias of Antioch the first time he saw the "St Tikhon" liturgy: to paraphrase, he expressed surprised at an Orthodox liturgy that listnever once mentioned the Theotokos. --[[User:JosephSuaiden|JosephSuaiden]] 21:14, just July 18, 2008 (UTC) == Something the list North Got Right == "I'm a Southerner by birth and at heart, though I do wish there were more proper bakeries south of proposals in 1923 itself the Mason-Dixon Line. That's possibly one of the major things Yankees have gotten right." They didn't do too bad at emancipation or crop-burning, either. And --[[User:Willibrord|Willibrord]] 03:36, June 28, 2008 (UTC) == Wikipedia: article or version permalink == I remember seeing am curious as to why you changed the Wikipedia link back to the general article (for the [[Leo VI]] article). Since the Wikipedia page was listed as a similar list of items source, my understanding is that OrthodoxWiki prefers the version permalink (cf. [[OrthodoxWiki:Style Manual (Importing)]]); for external links (from not sources), I can understand using the interwiki for the 1923 congressgeneral Wikipedia article, but this one is a source. —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 16:22, July 1, 2008 (UTC) == Non-standard characters == I remember (so I hope this happened) years ago discussing on an OCA sitethe wiki the policy of using standard Latin characters for article names. However, which I cannot find nowany mention of this policy or any discussion about it. And so I checked the move log, and the only moves for "standard characters" are mine. Do you remember anything about this reason , or do you have thoughts on writing this up as a policy? (I believe think it is necessary and important 's a good idea to have this part included for non-standard characters within the complete article, and unbiased pictureas a redirect to the article.* As for the second section I had entered ) —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] (comparative study[[User_talk:Magda|talk]])22:06, July 1, which included 2008 (UTC) == "African Orthodox Chruch" ==Hi Fr Andrew :)I wanted to ask you about a link topic I just came across.... In the [[Time of Church History]] article, the entry for 1924 refers to a site : ''"..Bp. Daniel William Alexander convenes meeting in Kimberley, South Africa, which detailed things about Metaxakis' early Masonic involvement right down decides to his troubled death, yes it too did not come secede from the African Church (a MCB site, Protestant denomination) and that will need to be re-worked as you commented, perhaps affiliate with more research from other sourcesthe "African Orthodox Church" in New York under George McGuire; but it too presented disturbing details"'' Anyways, I accidentally came across a webpage that discusses the history of the [http://www.coltranechurch.org/african.htm "African Orthodox Church"], which in themselves were by nature * not neutral * (istating "The A.O.eC. if he attained 33rd degree in 1909 that's important; if he was buried with Masonic honours founded by George Alexander McGuire in 1935 that fact too 1921."  After reading this short summary, I am still not sure who this group is important),.. obsvioulsy non-canonical with mainstream Orthodoxy?? It is doubtful how much other written research exists So, should we have an article on this subjectgroup in the OW, for clarification purposes? Or at least in English. At any rate I appreciate the direction. Would be interested in what an article on George Alexander McGuire? What do you think. ?Cheers,

== Thanks and congrats ==,

Dear Father, thank you for your friendly welcoming and congratulations for your ordination! --[[User:Cat68|Cat68]] 08:55, February 16, 2007 Jaye (PSTJacifus)

== HC invasion Great Schism Edit ==

Yes, indeed, we have descendedFr. Our social ethics project has been, basically, to make sure that there were articles written for just about every article under the Ethics section. This is the first phase, followed by a review by the professor, after which you can expect changes to these articles (whether or not they've been worked on by other people in the mean time). [[User:Vandrona|Vandrona]]

Congrat's on the birth of your first child!--[[User:AKCGY|AKCGY]] 15:08, March 5, 2007 Jaye (PSTjacifus)

Congratulations from : Please refer comments on the Andronachescontent of specific articles to their respective talk pages. Thanks! &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, as wellGaramond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Magda also wants me to add that she approves of March births Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:) Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:VandronaASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|VandronaTHINK!]] 15''')</font></small> 01:3108, March 5December 14, 2007 2008 (PSTUTC)

Thank I suppose we don't leave the article as it is now and if you for helphave the authority to clean up once again, FatherI'd strongly suggest you'd do so. (If I were to do the job, I'm afraid an edit war with Fatman2021 may become inevitable.) [[User:DdpbfVasstar|DdpbfVasstar]] 1814:25, March 1013, 2007December 14,2008 (CETUTC)

==JulianURGENT - Ambush by computer generated Users ==Ok, I admit my ignorance. Thanks for the info. [[User:Gabriela|Gabriela]] 17:23, March 12, 2007 (PDT)

: This is answered on [[Talk:Church of Russia]]. As is noted in a number of our policy documents, we have our own taxonomy here, which often does not reflect official, legal names. The official OrthodoxWiki standard for all Orthodox churches is ''Church of [Place]''. This policy has been in effect pretty much since the wiki was founded in 2004. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:FrjohnwhitefordASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|FrjohnwhitefordTHINK!]] 16''')</font></small> 19:4137, March December 18, 2007 2008 (UTC)::*I can perfectly see the logic behind such taxonomy and even accept it. But the point is, as i noted in my original edit comment, that such designation is not only formally incorrect, but in essence as well (by essence i mean the ecclesiological reasoning that obviously underpins your taxonomy). This is no more a Church of Russia than it is a Church of Ukraine (in fact, Ukraine could well lay a historically better grounded claim to it), or Latvia, for that matter. If one were to base the wording of the designation on the title of a Primate in question (which would be a legitimate thing to do within your taxonomy), the article would have to be called "Church of Moscow" (or "Church of Rus"). Paradoxically, you have chosen to employ the current official name of a country, which constitutes only a fraction (less than half by parish numbers) of the "canonical territory" of the ROC. How can you warrant that?[[User:Muscovite99|Max]] 20:00, December 22, 2008 (CDTUTC)

::: It's warranted with a combination of basic ecclesiology (i.e., the Church is not "Russian," "Greek," etc., but it is the Church in and of a particular place&mdash;Russia, Greece, etc.) and of English usage. ("Church of Russia" gets about 30,000 hits on Google.) It's notably the usage of such groups as the OCA[http://www.oca.org/OCworldrussia.asp?SID== See 2], etc. Of course its usage pales in comparison with "Russian Orthodox Church," but that term is objectionable for the above comments ==reasons previously noted. ("Church of Moscow" is a somewhat idiosyncratic term hardly ever used except in larger, translated phrases such as "Estonian Church of Moscow Patriarchate.")

I finally figured out ::: The many parishes in Ukraine are covered by a separate article: [[Church of Ukraine]] (along with articles on the right way. My comments above were added a longer routeirregular bodies, as well).

== Versions ::: No matter what one names these articles, they'll not be satisfactory to all. This is what our policy here is. Our policy has been to use the city names for the ancient patriarchates but common country names for the newer autocephalous and autonomous churches (the exceptions are the OCA, which is of names ==somewhat irregular status, and the Church of Sinai, which designates a region). You'll notice that this is consistently the case.

Bless father. I am asking wich versions ::: Anyway, the proper place to discuss the names of articles is on the talk pages of names I should to use? I was using Serbian versions, because in the articles abut Stthemselves. Sava That way, St. Nikolaj etc were used Serbian versionseveryone interested in working on the article can participate. Now I was told Please direct future comments to use English versions[[Talk:Church of Russia]]. I am confused &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3. Literature in english uses more often Serbian versions5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:DdpbfASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|DdpbfTHINK!]] March 20''')</font></small> 21:25, 17:24 December 22, 2008 (CETUTC)

== Interwiki Prove to Me that We need that Guy ==

It seams I will be the first to put UP my hand and say "WE NEED THAT GUY"! bet you never thought I would say that ww have problems with inter wiki on serbian page. From English to Serbian it works good but problem.--they way "sou vgazo glwssa oli tin wra" [[User:DdpbfIxthis888|DdpbfVasiliki]] 1003:2015, March 27December 19, 2007 2008 (PDTUTC)

: Vasiliki, it's not "we need ''that guy''," but rather I'm the Guy Who Says "Prove To Me That We Need That [article/addition/thing/etc.]." There is a reason why I placed the hyphens where I did. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color=images' deletion"red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 21:04, December 19, 2008 (UTC)::I give up ... I just wish you could not be so 'scholastic'with me some times and just ... lighten up :) I apologise in advance ... [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 13:13, December 20, 2008 (UTC)

Dear father your blessing.returning from Mt. Athos yesterday i found your notice about the deletion of my images because of tags::: Vasiliki, it' lack. i'm s not at all familiar with all "scholastic" to expect that electronic-copyright-jargon and ireaders actually read carefully. It'm not sure whether the corrections i did will works just good language usage. i hope i There'm not troubling you too much with my ignorances a reason why grammar, syntax, punctuation, etc.may , work the Holy Week and Easter brings light in your family and to way they do. It might help if you personallydidn't so frequently assume the worst when reading what other folks write.

yours::: Certainly, perhaps this level of reading and writing comprehension is not needed for everyday life (though I think it is!), but it surely is absolutely crucial when writing a reference work like an encyclopedia! Indeed, if being "scholastic" is needed anywhere, it's here. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</vassilisup> <small>[[Special: Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:VassilipASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|VassilipTHINK!]] 02''')</font></small> 16:4721, March 29December 20, 2007 2008 (PDTUTC)

both images ==Deletion of template==HEY - you deleted two templates so all the information on these is GONE! How do I get the information back? I know you are personal and i have the only original copiesmoderator/administrator but can you PLEASE just ONCE be kinder . truly i'm not cognizant of copyright policies and i used what i thought as probably more appropriate (i used .. give me a 24 hour notice to MOVE the information????? Can you please resupply the stuff IN the ''commons'' one because i read i had to do it)templates.again[[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 03:00, January 1, i'm relly sory for all that mess.2009 (UTC)

yours indeed: It's not gone. I've noted on your Talk page where you can find it. &mdash;[[User:VassilipASDamick|Vassilip<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]] 05''')</font></small> 13:0850, March 29January 1, 2007 2009 (PDTUTC)

== Kallistos Ware Font Colours ==

I arrived at his Which article talks about how to do font colours and was surprised to find that his elevation to Metropolitan had already been updated. Kudos.different text styles in HTML? [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 03:25, January 5, 2009 (UTC)

I was at a lecture hosted by His Eminence earlier today at : There isn't one on the wiki. There are plenty of HTML tutorials elsewhere, though. &mdash;[http[User://wwwASDamick|<font size="3.gocoos5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr.orgAndrew</ Greek Orthodox Church of Our Saviorfont>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]] in Rye, NY. The parish priest who introduced him mentioned to the audience that} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black"Bishop>contribs</font>]] <font face=" Ware was unaware of his elevation until the priest told him upon his arrival. Thus was I bemused at reading your update. Just out of curiosityAdobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, were you at the lecture as well? One of the brother priests perhaps? Times New Roman">(There were quite a few other priests'''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 04:20, January 6, and even a Romanian bishop2009 (UTC) Or did you come upon the information some other way?

== Capthca Not bad--you got rid of my talk post in just less than 24 hours. Not bad...my hat's off to you sir! You have a gift for registration ==wiki-editing!{{unsigned|AmanUwellCant}}

I see you guys : Inherently disruptive posts without any engagement regarding content are having the same problem removed as what I also want to deal with on our sitea matter of form. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. SeeAndrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk: httpASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/meta.wikimedia.orgWiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</wikifont></Captcha_extensionssmall> 01:56, January 22, 2009 (UTC)

== ReI am not the site owner but I am sure that if awards could be given to the most hard-woring Users on Orthodoxwiki there would be three to give out: you, Wsk and ASDamick! I wanted to pause at this point in my OrthodoxWiki career and acknowledge the efforts of those people who really do put a lot of time and effort into keeping OW alive and say Thank youfor the work and time you put into making the articles rewarding! ==!! [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 03:55, January 20, 2009 (UTC)

Christ Is Risen! Thank you very much, Father Andrew, for your kind words== Antioch and the Armenians ==I have been to a canonical Antiochian church where they gave communion to Armenians . Yours in Christ, --How do they do this ? [[User:ArbibleEugene|ArbibleEugene]] 0920:0125, April 13January 23, 2007 2009 (PDTUTC)

: Is it a sin to be ethnically Armenian? Anyway, I cannot answer for what is done in a particular parish. Why not talk to the pastor? &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color=Article Titles"green" face==Father Andrew"Adobe Garamond Pro,I have been working on articles concerning IreneGaramond, wife of Leo IVGeorgia, and TheodoraTimes New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, wife of Theophilus. I am about ready to post them on OrthodoxwikiGaramond, but I need good titles for the articles. To avoid too much work establishing titles on the webGeorgia, ITimes New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]'''ve sought your opinion as you have done so well in maintaining discipline of styles among all our articles. I find identifying many saints confusing with many of the saints having different titles applied to them. )</font></small> 22:44, January 23, 2009 (UTC)

I notice As in Armenian Apostolic. And he said that Wikipedia uses title of their names and a century when they lived, to avoid similarities were in communion with other Irenes and Theodoras. These seem blandthem, but that's why I haven't found any Orthodox source m asking you because you said on the web your page that provides distinct identification for these saints! I noticed in some edits you made to Orthodoxwiki articles that you seem to follow the Wikipedia practice. The Orthodox church sites havenit't been any help. s not possible [[User:Eugene|Eugene]] 23:49, January 23, 2009 (UTC)

Following : The Armenian Apostolic church is not in communion with the practice Orthodox Patriarchate of Theodora (Justinian's wife) does not appear reasonable for Irene or Theodora as their husbands were "Iconoclasts"Antioch. For Irene, many if not a majority of This is how my and all the sites identify Irene as "Irene bishops of Athens". I have been thinking of using this as a title for her. Another could be "Irene the Iconodule or Iconophile". For Theodora our Archdiocese consistently answer when questioned on the Iconodule/iconophile would fit nicelytopic.

Your comments and suggestions : Again, I cannot answer for what is done at a parish which is outside of my responsibility, especially when it is not clear that all the facts are solicitedapparent. (We have, for instance, Coptic Christians who commune at our parish, but that is because they are members of our parish, having been received into communion through confession of faith.) &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 00:52, January 24, 2009 (UTC)

Bill KosarI am a new user and could not find the detailed information about how to bring images from Wikimedia Commons to Orthodox Wiki. I would be very grateful if you could help. [[User:WskBag|WskBag]] 1521:0028, April 15March 6, 2007 2009 (PDTUTC)

::Thanks, Father. I think we are on the same path.[[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 18:13, April 15, 2007 (PDT)==?????LicensingArticle titles ==What is going on? I just noticed that you changed the license agreement from being able to export to not being able to export? Right after I quoted it for the exports to Wikipedia I did this morning. What or who grants licensing for Orthodox wiki and how do I get in touch with them? Also what part makes the dual license incompatible and doesn't that violate using the wiki engine?[[User:LoveMonkey|LoveMonkey]] 13:02, April 24, 2007 (PDT)

: 1. The wiki engine has nothing to do with licensing. ItHi, should I put the country name in the titles of my articles on churches (like Białystok, Poland)? They're already cathegorized as "Polish churches" so I don't think it's just a piece of softwarenecessary.[[User:Bag|Bag]] 09:06, March 9, 2009 (UTC)

: 3== Chrysostom ==Hello again, I looked at the St. Licensing on OrthodoxWiki was defined by John Chrysostom page, and thought that the administration within St. John Chrysostom Oratorical Festival should be included. It would show that he has inspired children to orate the first year word of its inception. It is unlikely God to be changed at this pointothers, since so many edits here continuing in his footsteps. Since I have been contributed under its terms. (This same message is being posted on your talk page.) &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Proparticipated in the past and am in it again this year, GaramondI though it would be a good idea to mention it, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{and maybe put a link to the [[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>GOARCH]]} <small>website where they talk more about it and give more information. Tell me what you think! Thanks, --[[SpecialUser:Contributions/ASDamickIliada|<font color="black">contribs</font>Iliada]]</small> 1418:1001, April 24March 16, 2007 2009 (PDTUTC)

: I've responded to your comment at [[Talk:John Chrysostom]]. In the future, you may wish to keep your comments limited only to the specific article in question. Posting it in multiple places is not in itself likely to gain notice. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color= Thanks "green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face=Thanks for the welcome"Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, and thanks for helping us sort out the copyright mess over at wikipedia. -- Times New Roman">('''[[User:PastordavidASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|PastordavidTHINK!]] 09''')</font></small> 01:1836, April 25March 19, 2007 2009 (PDTUTC)

== Deletions Is WO a live forum of information or is it selective in the information it displays? ==

'''Thanks''' I see This post refers to your following right behind me. I would delete them myself, but... I'm glad that you're apparently patrolling Special:Recentchanges. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] 16:18, May 2, 2007 (PDT)changes in the page;

==elI myself am not involved on the dispute and have no intention of support to either side in this tragedy.orthodox.org==

Fistly, When I'd like originally viewed this page I was disheartened to thank you for your answerobserve the lack of information and that misleading information had been posted there. Secondly, if I've undestood well your explanation, I should propose [[:el:User:kostisl]] appointed for host -if he wishes. He has already done excellent work on Orthodoxy in greek wikipedia, understand that this most likely had been posted by a user and he as such is the proper person I thing for this kind of jobnot subject to your personal knowledge. I wish you the best--[[User:Kalogeropoulos|Kalogeropoulos]] 06:22, May 25, 2007 (PDT)

== You dont like I find it when people edit your articles!! ==offensive that you would label this work as “Heavily Point of View”.

Ive noticed, Father Andrew, that I fail to understand why you dont like it when people edit your articleswould allow false and misleading information to remain posted. you get pissy A young and then re-edit them back inspired person chooses to their old update the page using only fact and most times INACURATE formyou would rather support outdated and misinformed material. How are you supposed to help this site if you cant put your own ignorant biases??

: Well, none I will stand corrected if you can show me grounds for your dismissal of the articles on OrthodoxWiki are "my" articles. updates to this page? I presume this note is regarding can provide you with factual record and account of all the [[Church of Estonia]] article. information I've addressed this both had posted on your talk that page and at the talk page for the article. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Frrequest that it be allowed to remain. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 17:43, May 30, 2007 (PDT)

Dear Fr. Andrew,Thank you for I can understand your removal of the Postal address and agree fairly to the greetingsemission of such information. All I'll send your regards if ever I will meet him.ask is be fair in relation to the content of the post?

Fr. Andrew wrote:Hello! [[User:Young_Serb|Young Serb]], I donsuspect that the conclusion of the original article (which was 't know if you know Archimandrite Philemon (Castro'very'' POV), but may have taken from the facts that were in case you doplay. In response to [[User:ASDamick|Fr Andrew]]'s request, I wanted have taken the liberty of bringing the two together.:Please consider that, as a parish, the subject matter was dubiously noteworthy enough to pass place on greetings to himOrthodoxWiki; as a parish that has now placed itself outside the Church, more so. He This doesn't excuse incorrect information, of course; but if you consider that details are sparse, this may have been done for a reason - this is, conceptually, an encyclopaedia, and is therefore rather lacking in emotive speech and I were in seminary together at Stminutiae. However, should you find the article to still be misleading, please correct it. Tikhon&mdash; by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] ^{''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''s for two years.[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''} at 13:37, April 24, 2009 (UTC)

== Not just a Comment Azarias? ==Χριστος ανεστη! This has nothing to do with Orthodox Wikipedia, but when I read the 3 youths passage on a Talk Page Holy Saturday, I noticed that Azarias is not one of the original three youths. there's Meeshak, Shadrack, and Abendago. Those three are describes throughout the whole reading, but then it says that Azarias said something. Who is Azarias? Thanks, --<font color="teal">[[User:Iliada|Iliada]]</font><font color="teal" size="100px"></font> 17:29, April 24, 2009 (UTC)

Dear Father: Shadrac,The allegation that Meshach, and Abednago are the Episcopal seat Babylonian names of the Metropolitanate of Hong Kong Hebrew Hananiah (Ananias), Azariah (Azarias) and South East Asia is Mishael (Misael). &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman"VACANT>Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color=" was not merely red"a comment on a >talk page</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color=". This allegation was black"incorporated>contribs</font>]] <font face=" into the article by a certain Marcus Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">(an Orthodox from the Philippines'''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 23:14, April 25, a former ROCOR member2009 (UTC) and he wrote:

"The '''Episcopacy is currently vacant as of March, 2007''' and may be abolished pending == With the decision of the Holy and Sacred Synod of Constantinople."feast! ==

- User MARCUS Revision as of 08:56Today already Pentecost is, May 4, 2007but at you on the Main page still congratulations with Ascention.

Please see==Proposed New Page?==Greetings Father. :) I wanted to ask your opinion about a new page I was thinking of adding. While researching some old books and resources for some of my articles, I found a number of puzzling abbreviations besides authors names, who were mostly Roman Catholic authors or scholars or from religious orders. Anyways, I found this list here: [http://orthodoxwikiwww.fisheaters.orgcom/indexreligiousorderabbreviations.php?title=Orthodox_Metropolitanate_of_Hong_Kong_and_Southeast_Asia&oldid=50808html Abbreviations of Religious Orders and Priestly Fraternitiies] User MARCUS Revision on May 04, 2007 and was thinking it would be a good reference page to add here, cataloged in OMHKSEA "Episcopacy"a Roman catholic category perhaps. Just an idea, this info would help eliminate guesswork when going over historical documents.Cheers, [[User:Angellight 888|Angellight 888]] 23:59, July 8, 2009 (UTC)

Fr. Andrew wroteDelete please this error redirect [http://ru.orthodoxwiki.org/index.and, in any event, it's just php?title=%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD&redirect=no] as recently created redirect page resulting from a comment on a talk pagetypographical error. It wasn't even incorporated into the article. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 05--[[User:Imerek|Imerek]] 22:2404, May 30March 12, 2007 2010 (PDTUTC)

==Let's Hope What is Orthodoxwiki?==

Dear Father,Certain individual/s are out to create confusion in I noticed you deleted (rather speedily) the minds of faithful members belonging Luther page I imported. I'm wondering if Orthodoxwiki is "Articles on topics directly pertaining to the '''canonical''' Orthodoxy" or "Articles giving Orthodox jurisdictions. Let's hope they will stop spreading lies and rumorsviews on all topics." {{unsigned|CircularReason}}

: See: [[OrthodoxWiki:Style_Manual#Types_of_Articles]]. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:FilipinoASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|FilipinoTHINK!]] 20''')</font></small> 19:5144, June 219, 2007 2010 (PDTUTC)

I had an idea to create a new template for [[User_talk:Angellight_888#New_Template|Orthodox Church and Roman Catholic Church history]], where the various ''Fr. Andrew wroteshared or related'': Regarding historical themes, subjects and articles of both churches could be grouped together neatly in one pathfinder / template. I have come to realize that it is quite a daunting task, and I was hoping I could ask for your recent commentopinion on what I have worked out so far (see this [[User_talk: Sorry about thatAngellight_888#New_Template|link]], on my talk-page). Many of the words or headings I have titled may need to be changed, and the focus tightened... I have used the word "history" rather than "relations" in the title, because it seems more appropriate and allows for the inclusion of links to relevant articles. When I looked thought it would go nicely at the bottom of the [[Timeline of Orthodox Church and Roman Catholic relations]] article; including such templates as you know is a successful pattern over at Wikipedia, and this particular timeline is one place on OW where I think it would be useful, and allow for the elimination of "see also" links, and some "external links" at the same time. Whenever you may have time for a look it would be much appreciated, that and feel free to go ahead and edit had already been changed, so all /change/correct/remove or add if you want to; I saw was the saved it on my talk page commentso I can work on it there until it is ready if we decide to keep it. My mistake. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 10Cheers and thanks, [[User:Angellight 888|Angellight 888]] 00:4525, June 2October 3, 2007 2010 (PDTUTC)

Retrieved ==Delete my account==This wiki isn't for me, it does not and cannot build from "httpany other source, unless it falls explicitly within the orthodox source material specifically. I just want to create articles based on Biblical topics and elaborate on them based on scholarship in all areas, not just Orthodoxy. Perhaps Theopedia would suit me better.--[[User://orthodoxwiki.org/User_talkTsommer|Tony]] 18:Filipino"59, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

: Done. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face= About Soko"Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr.tica Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 23:54, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

After seeing that you addressed the medication spam pages I mast to warn you reported, I followed the link and saw with pleasure that some individuals in Serbia, neither of them is cleric, traying to acuse Metropolitan John for warious heresies. They you are gathering on website gazimestanthe same Fr.com. Holy Synod condemed this website. They targets are also bishop Ignjatije of Branicevo and some other Serbian and Greek TheoligicansAndrew I've run into elsewhere.

--A pleasure,[[User:DdpbfJonathansCornerCom|DdpbfJonathansCornerCom]] 1022:0451, June 15August 17, 2007 2011 (PDTUTC)

== Timeline of Church History Question ==Hello Father, Eulogeite.Thanks for your comments on my talk page about the timeline. Yes it's true the later more recent historical entries (esp. after 1991) do amount to mini paragraphs. Its easier of course to add more details about events closer to our own time, but you are right. I was aware of it as well, but originally concentrated on recording the content at first. I will certainly try to go back asap and edit out the extraneous details for those entries. May take some time but I will definitely go back and work on it, aiming for headlines only. If there are articles to place the extra details in will do. Would like to add a few more entires this week, then go back and edit out as much as possible from the long entries I placed.Many thanks again,Cheers.

: It wasn't me! :) &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] ^{[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]} <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:Angellight_888ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|Angellight_888THINK!]] 20''')</font></small> 03:4550, July 8August 6, 2007 2013 (EDTHST)