Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Orthodoxyinaustralasia"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: The [[List of Australian bishops|list of bishops]] could include all bishops that have historically served in Australasia, which I'm sure would be more than eight. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 23:43, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT) | :: The [[List of Australian bishops|list of bishops]] could include all bishops that have historically served in Australasia, which I'm sure would be more than eight. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 23:43, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :oops! only just saw this, sorry! what do you think about the way it is now? [[User:Pistevo|oea]] 19:46, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:46, September 20, 2005
What would you think about compressing this template, as was recently done with Template:Orthodoxyinamerica? Perhaps the lists of monasteries and bishops could be turned into one general link connecting to a list article for each. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 10:05, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT)
- i like the idea, but the problem is deciding what should be included and what shouldn't be...australasia being so small and all. particularly the bishops list - there's, like, 8 bishops. perhaps getting rid of the auxillery ones? shrinking the monastery list somewhat would be good (and easier); perhaps listing the major monasteries as well. i'll do that now, let me know what you think. oea 22:34, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT)
- The list of bishops could include all bishops that have historically served in Australasia, which I'm sure would be more than eight. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 23:43, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT)
- oops! only just saw this, sorry! what do you think about the way it is now? oea 19:46, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)
