Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Orthodoxyinaustralasia"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What would you think about compressing this template, as was recently done with [[Template:Orthodoxyinamerica]]? Perhaps the lists of monasteries and bishops could be turned into one general link connecting to a list article for each. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 10:05, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT) | What would you think about compressing this template, as was recently done with [[Template:Orthodoxyinamerica]]? Perhaps the lists of monasteries and bishops could be turned into one general link connecting to a list article for each. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 10:05, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT) | ||
| − | :i like the idea, but the problem is deciding what should be included and what shouldn't be...australasia being so small and all. particularly the bishops list - there's, like, 8 bishops. perhaps getting rid of the auxillery ones? shrinking the monastery list somewhat would be good (and easier); perhaps listing the major monasteries as well. i'll do that now, let me know. [[User:Pistevo|oea]] 22:34, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT) | + | :i like the idea, but the problem is deciding what should be included and what shouldn't be...australasia being so small and all. particularly the bishops list - there's, like, 8 bishops. perhaps getting rid of the auxillery ones? shrinking the monastery list somewhat would be good (and easier); perhaps listing the major monasteries as well. i'll do that now, let me know what you think. [[User:Pistevo|oea]] 22:34, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT) |
Revision as of 02:34, September 17, 2005
What would you think about compressing this template, as was recently done with Template:Orthodoxyinamerica? Perhaps the lists of monasteries and bishops could be turned into one general link connecting to a list article for each. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 10:05, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT)
- i like the idea, but the problem is deciding what should be included and what shouldn't be...australasia being so small and all. particularly the bishops list - there's, like, 8 bishops. perhaps getting rid of the auxillery ones? shrinking the monastery list somewhat would be good (and easier); perhaps listing the major monasteries as well. i'll do that now, let me know what you think. oea 22:34, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT)
