Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline of Church History"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Sign your posts!)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
'''Please note:''' On this and all Timeline articles, entries should be simple and brief and read like newspaper headlines.  There should be no citations or commentary included in entries.  Place that sort of material in new articles.  External links contained in entries (e.g., to Wikipedia) should only be included if doing so would significantly illuminate the meaning of the entry.  (The idea is not to link nearly every possible word, but only those which have significant meaning to the history of Orthodoxy.)
 +
 +
Thanks!  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 06:03, July 26, 2007 (PDT)
 +
 +
 +
==EasyTimeline==
 
Any thought of using [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:EasyTimeline_syntax EasyTimeline Syntax] for this page? Thanks, [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]
 
Any thought of using [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:EasyTimeline_syntax EasyTimeline Syntax] for this page? Thanks, [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]
  

Revision as of 13:03, July 26, 2007

Please note: On this and all Timeline articles, entries should be simple and brief and read like newspaper headlines. There should be no citations or commentary included in entries. Place that sort of material in new articles. External links contained in entries (e.g., to Wikipedia) should only be included if doing so would significantly illuminate the meaning of the entry. (The idea is not to link nearly every possible word, but only those which have significant meaning to the history of Orthodoxy.)

Thanks! —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 06:03, July 26, 2007 (PDT)


EasyTimeline

Any thought of using EasyTimeline Syntax for this page? Thanks, Fr. John

I looked at that but couldn't make heads nor tails of it. From another look just now, I think that even if I did master it, the complexity would end up inhibiting contribution from others. --Rdr. Andrew 11:53, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)
Yep, looking a little more deeply I can see that it might be more trouble than it's worth! Fr. John

It is very good, brief at the same time, useful and helpful Timeline of Church History. However I am not able to print it.Please advise how to do it. Aleksiy

Hi Aleksiy, this site uses a special stylesheet for printers, so that no "print-friendly pages" are required. Check it out, and let us know how it goes. Yours in Christ, Fr. John

I corrected the date of the Glastonbury mission of St. Joseph of Arimathea, and provided the correct information for the latter date with regards to the Church in Britain. Aristibule

EasyTimeline

I think you've got a great resource here, and I have been exploring constructing something similar using EasyTimeline. I've found that once the timeline is up, it isn't so hard to maintain. Feel free to drop me an email if that is something you'd be interested in and I'd be happy to assist with development. I do of course, also understand the competing need for simplicity of design - so no hard feelings if you don't take me up on the offer. Meanwhile, check out a useful resource one user has developed that can assist in timeline design from scratch: http://newped2.auckland.ac.nz/exe/exe/timeline/form.html. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kidwellj (talkcontribs) .