Difference between revisions of "Talk:Theosis"
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:This article has a strange emphasis and cites not-Orthodox texts as Scripture. I'm removing it and replacing it with the Wikipedia article on Theosis, which itself will need some modification. The possible source of this material was [http://church-of-the-east.org/theology/theosis.htm]. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] 15:23, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT) | :This article has a strange emphasis and cites not-Orthodox texts as Scripture. I'm removing it and replacing it with the Wikipedia article on Theosis, which itself will need some modification. The possible source of this material was [http://church-of-the-east.org/theology/theosis.htm]. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] 15:23, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: At first I thought this "Church of the East" might be the Nestorians, but when I looked at the front page and noticed the bit about [http://church-of-the-east.org/sacred%20sensuality/sacred_sensuality.shtml "sacred sensuality"], I became much more suspicious. This group isn't even as Orthodox as the Nestorians. --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 19:47, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:47, April 6, 2005
I don't think you ought to be using the term 'Yesu' here. You're writing in English and so Jesus would be more appropriate.James 08:56, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
- This article has a strange emphasis and cites not-Orthodox texts as Scripture. I'm removing it and replacing it with the Wikipedia article on Theosis, which itself will need some modification. The possible source of this material was [1]. Fr. John 15:23, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
- At first I thought this "Church of the East" might be the Nestorians, but when I looked at the front page and noticed the bit about "sacred sensuality", I became much more suspicious. This group isn't even as Orthodox as the Nestorians. --Rdr. Andrew 19:47, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
