Difference between revisions of "Talk:ROCOR and OCA"
Joe Rodgers (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: OK, I figured you knew that. Would it be appropriate to acknowledge that in some way? --[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 11:02, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT) | :: OK, I figured you knew that. Would it be appropriate to acknowledge that in some way? --[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 11:02, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Perhaps if there were a separate article about that monastery, that would be the place to do it. The reason I'm hesitant to include such information in this article is that the ROCOR/OCA relationship is complicated enough as it is without branching off too much into other histories. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 12:13, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:13, June 16, 2005
Isn't the Monastery of the Glorious Ascension (Resaca, GA) under the Jerusalem Patriarch? --Joe Rodgers 23:46, 15 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- Yes, currently, but in '97 it came under ROCOR from the OCA. I believe they came under Jerusalem just recently. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 08:32, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- OK, I figured you knew that. Would it be appropriate to acknowledge that in some way? --Joe Rodgers 11:02, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- Perhaps if there were a separate article about that monastery, that would be the place to do it. The reason I'm hesitant to include such information in this article is that the ROCOR/OCA relationship is complicated enough as it is without branching off too much into other histories. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 12:13, 16 Jun 2005 (EDT)
