Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pavel Florensky"
m |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:This would mean that it's no longer disputed, yes? — edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="red">Pι</font>]][[Special:Listusers/sysop|s]][[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="yellow">τ</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Pistevo|é]][[User:Pistevo|<font color="blue">vο</font>]] at 19:08, June 14, 2006 (CDT) | :This would mean that it's no longer disputed, yes? — edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="red">Pι</font>]][[Special:Listusers/sysop|s]][[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="yellow">τ</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Pistevo|é]][[User:Pistevo|<font color="blue">vο</font>]] at 19:08, June 14, 2006 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | I would hope so. But, then it is easy to "get into hot water" when religion is dicussed. Especially when writing about controversial people![[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 19:45, June 14, 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 00:45, June 15, 2006
Glorification
According to the Wikipedia article linked, ROCOR didn't glorify Fr Pavel, and considered it impossible to do so. — edited by Pιsτévο at 21:05, June 13, 2006 (CDT)
- Yeah, I'd gotten the impression that Florensky hadn't been glorified by anyone. —Dcn. Andrew talk random contribs 21:14, June 13, 2006 (CDT)
Thank you for the alert. I noted the ROCOR when I was writing the article and thought was strange and hoped some onr would address the point. I went back to the Wikipedia article and found the it was revised on June 1, 2006 after I had originally copied the earlier copy. There are two revisions that got to the current text.
I'll delete the sentence. I also note that Paul Florensky is listed as a new matryr on the Calendar for December 15.
Thanks again for the alert.Wsk 19:01, June 14, 2006 (CDT)
- This would mean that it's no longer disputed, yes? — edited by Pιsτévο at 19:08, June 14, 2006 (CDT)
I would hope so. But, then it is easy to "get into hot water" when religion is dicussed. Especially when writing about controversial people!Wsk 19:45, June 14, 2006 (CDT)