Difference between revisions of "Talk:Miaphysitism"
(New page: == Exclusively Non-Chalcedonian? == Wouldn't it be more correct to say that Miaphysitism is also a secondary Christology of the Chalcedonian churches on the basis of the definitions of the...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Exclusively Non-Chalcedonian? == | == Exclusively Non-Chalcedonian? == | ||
Wouldn't it be more correct to say that Miaphysitism is also a secondary Christology of the Chalcedonian churches on the basis of the definitions of the First Council of Ephesus and the Second Council of Constantinople? [[User:Deusveritasest|Deusveritasest]] 02:08, March 9, 2009 (UTC) | Wouldn't it be more correct to say that Miaphysitism is also a secondary Christology of the Chalcedonian churches on the basis of the definitions of the First Council of Ephesus and the Second Council of Constantinople? [[User:Deusveritasest|Deusveritasest]] 02:08, March 9, 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It depends, this article represents the [[Oriental Orthodox]] point of view on what miaphysitism means and not the [[Eastern orthodox]] definition. That is why the article has a disclaimer at the top to indicate that the definition is from their point of view and not from the Eastern church ... i hope this provides some insight. [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 03:19, March 9, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:19, March 9, 2009
Exclusively Non-Chalcedonian?
Wouldn't it be more correct to say that Miaphysitism is also a secondary Christology of the Chalcedonian churches on the basis of the definitions of the First Council of Ephesus and the Second Council of Constantinople? Deusveritasest 02:08, March 9, 2009 (UTC)
- It depends, this article represents the Oriental Orthodox point of view on what miaphysitism means and not the Eastern orthodox definition. That is why the article has a disclaimer at the top to indicate that the definition is from their point of view and not from the Eastern church ... i hope this provides some insight. Vasiliki 03:19, March 9, 2009 (UTC)
