Difference between revisions of "Talk:Magi"
(New page: If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the stat...) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the statement that it is unknown whether they have ben regarded as saints. --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 16:11, July 24, 2008 (UTC) | If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the statement that it is unknown whether they have ben regarded as saints. --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 16:11, July 24, 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I also restored the reference to the Latin tradition from which we have the names of the Magi as given in this article. There are other traditions, e.g., Armenian and Syriac, that give very different names. --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 16:14, July 24, 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:14, July 24, 2008
If the Magi are commemorated by the Church -- and they have been in both Eastern and Western tradition (before the Great Schism), then they are saints. I therefore removed (again) the statement that it is unknown whether they have ben regarded as saints. --Fr Lev 16:11, July 24, 2008 (UTC)
I also restored the reference to the Latin tradition from which we have the names of the Magi as given in this article. There are other traditions, e.g., Armenian and Syriac, that give very different names. --Fr Lev 16:14, July 24, 2008 (UTC)
