Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of American monasteries"
Anastasios (talk | contribs) (→Non-Chalcedonians vs Old Calendarists) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I noticed that in 2008 someone deleted the section on Old Calendarist monasteries due to MCB, but I see a section for Coptic Non-Chalcedonians allowed as a sort of appendix at the bottom. Given this, would it be possible to have a similar appendix for functioning Old Calendarist monasteries in the USA? Having read the section on Point of View, I am not honestly not sure what is acceptable and what is not. Thanks. --[[User:Anastasios|Anastasios]] 18:13, March 19, 2010 (UTC) | I noticed that in 2008 someone deleted the section on Old Calendarist monasteries due to MCB, but I see a section for Coptic Non-Chalcedonians allowed as a sort of appendix at the bottom. Given this, would it be possible to have a similar appendix for functioning Old Calendarist monasteries in the USA? Having read the section on Point of View, I am not honestly not sure what is acceptable and what is not. Thanks. --[[User:Anastasios|Anastasios]] 18:13, March 19, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :This seems internally consistant...I agree that including Non-Chalcedonians while excluding Old Calendarists is logically inconsistant. My stance is that if one is allowed, both should be allowed, but even that leaves two options open. Perhaps others would be better placed to make a better determination? — by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 23:45, March 19, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:45, March 19, 2010
Non-Chalcedonians vs Old Calendarists
I noticed that in 2008 someone deleted the section on Old Calendarist monasteries due to MCB, but I see a section for Coptic Non-Chalcedonians allowed as a sort of appendix at the bottom. Given this, would it be possible to have a similar appendix for functioning Old Calendarist monasteries in the USA? Having read the section on Point of View, I am not honestly not sure what is acceptable and what is not. Thanks. --Anastasios 18:13, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
- This seems internally consistant...I agree that including Non-Chalcedonians while excluding Old Calendarists is logically inconsistant. My stance is that if one is allowed, both should be allowed, but even that leaves two options open. Perhaps others would be better placed to make a better determination? — by Pιsτévο talk complaints at 23:45, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
