Talk:Holy Order of MANS
On this and other articles that touch on very controversial subjects in the life of the church, it's all the more important to stand by NPOV - this means being careful to describe and document the controversy as thoroughly and dispassionately as possible from both sides without making a value judgment. As the wiki-moderator, this is what I will be looking for and supporting in subsequent edits.
That's why I changed the part about motives to the header "Controversy". Perhaps someone who knows the situation from the perspective of these groups will care to make a response, and someone who knows more details will fill them out. Fr. John 09:40, November 14, 2005 (CST)
- Excellent point Father. I confess I don't have the best literary background to convey a NPOV. I think I make the article sound immature with phrases like "some question" or "some claim." I could stand to learn a thing or two in this regard. I appreciate the name change of that header, thank you. Joe ( talk » inspect » chat ) 10:29, November 14, 2005 (CST)
Removal of parish listing
Twice now a line listing a parish has been removed without comment as to its removal. This needs to be addressed here on the Talk page or at least in the comment line before it's done. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 19:46, April 1, 2006 (CST)
- User:Magberry writes (offline): "I know the priest at St. Herman's in Grand Rapids, and he has no affiliation (present or past) with CSB, nor do any of his parishioners. I don't know how that parish got listed in this way, but I thought I'd correct the error."
- I checked into this, and the confusion seems to come from the fact that the domain name is currently (since 2003) under new ownership. (It looks like it expired in 2001, and was re-registered in 2003.) Magberry is correct. We should be more careful about this when linking to archive.org in the future! — FrJohn (talk)