Difference between revisions of "Talk:Holy Order of MANS"
Joe Rodgers (talk | contribs) |
Joe Rodgers (talk | contribs) m (signature correction. It's been so long I forget how to do this!) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
That's why I changed the part about motives to the header "Controversy". Perhaps someone who knows the situation from the perspective of these groups will care to make a response, and someone who knows more details will fill them out. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] 09:40, November 14, 2005 (CST) | That's why I changed the part about motives to the header "Controversy". Perhaps someone who knows the situation from the perspective of these groups will care to make a response, and someone who knows more details will fill them out. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] 09:40, November 14, 2005 (CST) | ||
| − | :Excellent point Father. I confess I don't have the best literary background to convey a NPOV. I think I make the article sound immature with phrases like "some question" or "some claim." I could stand to learn a thing or two in this regard. I appreciate the name change of that header, thank you. | + | :Excellent point Father. I confess I don't have the best literary background to convey a NPOV. I think I make the article sound immature with phrases like "some question" or "some claim." I could stand to learn a thing or two in this regard. I appreciate the name change of that header, thank you. {{User:Joe Rodgers/sig}} 10:29, November 14, 2005 (CST) |
Revision as of 16:31, November 14, 2005
On this and other articles that touch on very controversial subjects in the life of the church, it's all the more important to stand by NPOV - this means being careful to describe and document the controversy as thoroughly and dispassionately as possible from both sides without making a value judgment. As the wiki-moderator, this is what I will be looking for and supporting in subsequent edits.
That's why I changed the part about motives to the header "Controversy". Perhaps someone who knows the situation from the perspective of these groups will care to make a response, and someone who knows more details will fill them out. Fr. John 09:40, November 14, 2005 (CST)
- Excellent point Father. I confess I don't have the best literary background to convey a NPOV. I think I make the article sound immature with phrases like "some question" or "some claim." I could stand to learn a thing or two in this regard. I appreciate the name change of that header, thank you. Joe ( talk » inspect » chat ) 10:29, November 14, 2005 (CST)
