Difference between revisions of "Talk:Head Coverings"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the "Head Coverings in Church" link under "Non-Orthodox", I find it amusing that in the 1917 Code of Canon Law, men must have the heads of bears. [[User:Magda|magda]] 13:58, 30 Jan 2005 (CST) | In the "Head Coverings in Church" link under "Non-Orthodox", I find it amusing that in the 1917 Code of Canon Law, men must have the heads of bears. [[User:Magda|magda]] 13:58, 30 Jan 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :This amusing misspelling reminds me of the numerous hymns we have which want to refer to the past tense of "bear" (as in "to bear a child"), and use "bare." How many times have I heard it sung that the Theotokos "bare" our Lord? ''*shakes head*'' --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 21:05, 30 Jan 2005 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:05, January 31, 2005
In the "Head Coverings in Church" link under "Non-Orthodox", I find it amusing that in the 1917 Code of Canon Law, men must have the heads of bears. magda 13:58, 30 Jan 2005 (CST)
- This amusing misspelling reminds me of the numerous hymns we have which want to refer to the past tense of "bear" (as in "to bear a child"), and use "bare." How many times have I heard it sung that the Theotokos "bare" our Lord? *shakes head* --Rdr. Andrew 21:05, 30 Jan 2005 (CST)
