Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hagiography"
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's not fully adapted yet, but I do think we should leave in something about the Bollandists and the modern study of hagiography. [[User:FrJohn|FrJohn]] | It's not fully adapted yet, but I do think we should leave in something about the Bollandists and the modern study of hagiography. [[User:FrJohn|FrJohn]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Agreed. I don't think we necessarily need to have an "adapted from Wikipedia" template. After all, the original articles themselves are likely to be changed subsequent to our adaptation of them. I think it's probably save to keep such attribution in the comment in the editing history and/or in a "Sources" header at the bottom. --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 16:11, 18 Jan 2005 (CST) |
Revision as of 22:11, January 18, 2005
It's not fully adapted yet, but I do think we should leave in something about the Bollandists and the modern study of hagiography. FrJohn
- Agreed. I don't think we necessarily need to have an "adapted from Wikipedia" template. After all, the original articles themselves are likely to be changed subsequent to our adaptation of them. I think it's probably save to keep such attribution in the comment in the editing history and/or in a "Sources" header at the bottom. --Rdr. Andrew 16:11, 18 Jan 2005 (CST)