Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hagiography"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
It's not fully adapted yet, but I do think we should leave in something about the Bollandists and the modern study of hagiography. [[User:FrJohn|FrJohn]]
 
It's not fully adapted yet, but I do think we should leave in something about the Bollandists and the modern study of hagiography. [[User:FrJohn|FrJohn]]
 +
 +
: Agreed.  I don't think we necessarily need to have an "adapted from Wikipedia" template.  After all, the original articles themselves are likely to be changed subsequent to our adaptation of them.  I think it's probably save to keep such attribution in the comment in the editing history and/or in a "Sources" header at the bottom.  --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 16:11, 18 Jan 2005 (CST)

Revision as of 22:11, January 18, 2005

It's not fully adapted yet, but I do think we should leave in something about the Bollandists and the modern study of hagiography. FrJohn

Agreed. I don't think we necessarily need to have an "adapted from Wikipedia" template. After all, the original articles themselves are likely to be changed subsequent to our adaptation of them. I think it's probably save to keep such attribution in the comment in the editing history and/or in a "Sources" header at the bottom. --Rdr. Andrew 16:11, 18 Jan 2005 (CST)