Difference between revisions of "Talk:Great Schism"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The year link was copied from the filioque article--should that link likewise be removed? --[[User:Magda|magda]] 15:25, 7 Feb 2005 (CST) | The year link was copied from the filioque article--should that link likewise be removed? --[[User:Magda|magda]] 15:25, 7 Feb 2005 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Yep. I don't think we're likely to have enough articles here for a particular year that would justify a year having its own article. (The [[Filioque]] article also needs some serious work.) --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 15:34, 7 Feb 2005 (CST) |
Revision as of 21:34, February 7, 2005
The year link was copied from the filioque article--should that link likewise be removed? --magda 15:25, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)
- Yep. I don't think we're likely to have enough articles here for a particular year that would justify a year having its own article. (The Filioque article also needs some serious work.) --Rdr. Andrew 15:34, 7 Feb 2005 (CST)