Difference between revisions of "Talk:Filioque"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I originally imported this from Wikipedia, but it seems to me that this article needs a major reworking, if not replacement. Its rhetoric is pretty convoluted and unclear. --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 19:50, 1 Feb 2005 (CST) | I originally imported this from Wikipedia, but it seems to me that this article needs a major reworking, if not replacement. Its rhetoric is pretty convoluted and unclear. --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 19:50, 1 Feb 2005 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Update: It has, indeed, been significantly reworked! —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 12:39, 4 Jul 2005 (EDT) | ||
==Misspelling?== | ==Misspelling?== | ||
Do you think it's really necessary to include a misspelled version? It seems that could set a somewhat awkward precedent. I don't see that sort of thing in any encyclopedia with which I'm familiar. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 12:39, 4 Jul 2005 (EDT) | Do you think it's really necessary to include a misspelled version? It seems that could set a somewhat awkward precedent. I don't see that sort of thing in any encyclopedia with which I'm familiar. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 12:39, 4 Jul 2005 (EDT) |
Revision as of 16:39, July 4, 2005
I originally imported this from Wikipedia, but it seems to me that this article needs a major reworking, if not replacement. Its rhetoric is pretty convoluted and unclear. --Rdr. Andrew 19:50, 1 Feb 2005 (CST)
Update: It has, indeed, been significantly reworked! —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 12:39, 4 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Misspelling?
Do you think it's really necessary to include a misspelled version? It seems that could set a somewhat awkward precedent. I don't see that sort of thing in any encyclopedia with which I'm familiar. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 12:39, 4 Jul 2005 (EDT)