Difference between revisions of "Talk:Euchologion of Serapion of Thmuis"
m (Question about this book)
m (Talk:Sacramentary of Serapion of Thmuis moved to Talk:Euchologion of Serapion of Thmuis: Using Orthodox, Eastern terminology, rather than Western.)
|(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)|
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
Can a Theologian verify if this book
Can a Theologian verify if this book used historically the development of some of our Eastern Orthodox services (ie. Such as Unction)? [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]]
Latest revision as of 00:37, December 22, 2008
In the book "The Search for the Origins of Christian Worship" By Paul F. Bradshaw, he discusses on Page 104:
- ... the Canons of Hippolytus present us with difficulties of interpretation: we do not know exactly where the document comes from, nor how far it represents what was really happening in the early fourth century. The authenticity of the only other major witness to the early Egyptian liturgical tradition, the Sacramentary of Sarapion, has also been questioned in the past. This collection of 30 pryaers attributed .... is extant in a single eleventh-century manuscript in the monastery of the Great Lavra on Mount Athos ...
Can a Theologian verify if this book is used historically to support the development of some of our Eastern Orthodox Sacramental services (ie. Such as Unction)? Vasiliki