Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Dioscorus of Alexandria

184 bytes added, 04:44, March 14, 2009
no edit summary
Is it really appropriate to be referring to Leo I in our articles as "the Roman Catholic Pope Leo I", especially given that we designate a distinction between the "Roman Catholic Church" and the pre-Schism "Church of Rome"? Does this designation make it sound like we're recognizing the claim of the modern RCC to continuation with the pre-Schism Church of Rome? [[User:Deusveritasest|Deusveritasest]] 21:40, March 13, 2009 (UTC)
: Indeed, no! It is entirely inappropriate. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 00:41, March 14, 2009 (UTC)
== Cyril, Two natures, and the Non-Chalcedonians ==
Not only did Cyril not accept that Christ is two natures after the union (usually the formula referred to when simply saying "two natures after the union"), but rather simply "of/from two natures", but the text appears to also suggest that Cyril accepted Christ as "Son of God, and Son of Man, and that God did not suffer nor did He die". If we are to simply look at the 12 anathemas we can see that to suggest such is clear foolishness. I think some reworking of the text needs to be done here as well. [[User:Deusveritasest|Deusveritasest]] 22:01, March 13, 2009 (UTC)
 
== Heretic? ==
 
Where is it established in EO Tradition that Dioscorus is a heretic? [[User:Deusveritasest|Deusveritasest]] 04:44, March 14, 2009 (UTC)

Navigation menu