Difference between revisions of "Talk:Diaspora"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: The Orthodox Church in America is not considered a "church in the diaspora" When they were a part of the Russian Church Abroad they could have been considered thus, but since they lay cla...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I stand corrected, they have two parishes in Australia.  Aside from that, all their parishes are on the North American continent.
 
I stand corrected, they have two parishes in Australia.  Aside from that, all their parishes are on the North American continent.
 +
 +
Angel1
 +
 +
: The reference in the article is to parishes "outside their traditionally defined canonical territory," which for the OCA includes both the parishes in Australia and also those in Mexico (the tomos from Moscow excludes Mexico in paragraph 7[http://www.oca.org/DOCtomos.asp?SID=12]).  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 18:19, May 30, 2007 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 01:19, May 31, 2007

The Orthodox Church in America is not considered a "church in the diaspora" When they were a part of the Russian Church Abroad they could have been considered thus, but since they lay claim to North America, which is where ALL their parishes are located, they should be removed from this list.

I stand corrected, they have two parishes in Australia. Aside from that, all their parishes are on the North American continent.

Angel1

The reference in the article is to parishes "outside their traditionally defined canonical territory," which for the OCA includes both the parishes in Australia and also those in Mexico (the tomos from Moscow excludes Mexico in paragraph 7[1]). —Fr. Andrew talk contribs 18:19, May 30, 2007 (PDT)