Difference between revisions of "Talk:Autocephaly"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:It does seem to want to be in quotation marks, though, for ''status'': "on" is the status of the light switch. Is there a different way to phrase the sentence?  {{User:Magda/sig}} 20:18, November 21, 2005 (CST)
 
:It does seem to want to be in quotation marks, though, for ''status'': "on" is the status of the light switch. Is there a different way to phrase the sentence?  {{User:Magda/sig}} 20:18, November 21, 2005 (CST)
  
:: Yes, quite likely.  I'm not at all in especially love with "Autocephaly is the status..."  {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 20:22, November 21, 2005 (CST)
+
:: Yes, quite likely.  I'm not at all in especially love with "Autocephaly is the status..."  {{User:ASDamick/sig}} 20:22, November 21, 2005

Revision as of 17:13, August 14, 2006

Grammar

Using a noun as the subject of a sentence is perfectly acceptable, especially when that sentence is essentially a statement of definition. In this case, the first sentence answers the question, "What is autocephaly?" —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) (B.A. English, NCSU, '01) 17:53, November 21, 2005 (CST)

It does seem to want to be in quotation marks, though, for status: "on" is the status of the light switch. Is there a different way to phrase the sentence? —magda (talk) 20:18, November 21, 2005 (CST)
Yes, quite likely. I'm not at all in especially love with "Autocephaly is the status..." —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 20:22, November 21, 2005