Changes

== Saints == I came across his Ethelhard's commemoration ([[May 12]]) as a saint in [http://www.ortodoxakyrkan.se/Typikon%202005.pdf this typikon]. There are a [http://www.orthodoxengland.btinternet.co.uk/stdmay.htm few] [http://www.odox.net/Icons-Ethelhard.htm more] mentions in Orthodox commemorations, but not many.Found Deusdedit for [[July 14]] in the same typikon. —[[User:Magda|magda]] 12:02, 30 Jun 2005 (EDT)  ==non-Orthodox==I am wondering if it would make more sence to NOT list all the "Archbishops" that are "technically" not Orthodox since they are a continuation of the line but post-Schism. I find that keeping the list of Archbishops is deceiving in that it can confuse or imply that there is a connection to Orthodoxy. What do others think? [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 07:23, May 11, 2009 (UTC) == Reginald Pole == Reginald Pole, while post-Reformation, was actually a Roman Catholic Archbishop (under Mary). Should he be listed as such? -- [[User:Joffridus|Joffridus]] Yes. Under Queen Mary, the see was Roman but it was still the archbishopric of Canterbury. --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 20:41, August 7, 2009 (UTC) == King Lucius ==The ''History'' section of this article mentions King Lucius connected with the origins of Christianity in Britian. However I believe modern scholarship has largely dismissed this legend as erroneous; there is a good explantion of why it is not factual at the Catholic Encyclopedia's article on [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05378a.htm Pope St. Eleutherius]. I therefore suggest either qualifying or removing the reference.Cheers, :)[[User:Angellight 888|Angellight 888]] 01:57, August 9, 2009 (UTC)