Difference between revisions of "Talk:Antonio (de Rosso) of Ravenna"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Am I right that Metropolitan Antonio is an Old Calendarist bishop? --[[User:Arbible|Arbible]] 12:19, August 28, 2006 (CDT) | Am I right that Metropolitan Antonio is an Old Calendarist bishop? --[[User:Arbible|Arbible]] 12:19, August 28, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | :His church (ie Orthodox Church in Italy) is Old Calendarist, so yes. If he is to be considered a bishop, his article needs renaming (I assume to 'Antonio (de Rosso) of Italy' or something similar), currently the implication is that he is a figure (i.e. not even a monk). — edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 06:52, August 29, 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:52, August 29, 2006
Am I right that Metropolitan Antonio is an Old Calendarist bishop? --Arbible 12:19, August 28, 2006 (CDT)
- His church (ie Orthodox Church in Italy) is Old Calendarist, so yes. If he is to be considered a bishop, his article needs renaming (I assume to 'Antonio (de Rosso) of Italy' or something similar), currently the implication is that he is a figure (i.e. not even a monk). — edited by Pιsτévο talk complaints at 06:52, August 29, 2006 (CDT)
