Open main menu
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Holy Synod of Milan
3,214 bytes added
23:37, February 29, 2008
As with many of the [[Old Calendarist]] jurisdictions, the Milan Synod is not currently in communion with
the some Orthodox churches, especially the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
It is a popular opinion, allegedly promoted by the Patriarch of Constantinople, his Grace Metataxis, that any local Synod not in direct communion with Constantinople, or another Synod recognized by the Ecumenical Patriarch, must not be truly Orthodox. Others believe that this opinion is contrary to Orthodox Tradition and inconsistent with the historical experience of the Church. The criteria by which one may judge the canonical status of any Orthodox jurisdiction, they profer, can be ascertained by asking the following questions:
1. Is the founding Synod of a newer Synod itself a valid, canonical body? That is, does it possess [[Apostolic Succession]], manifested through the unbroken succession of its bishops and genuine Orthodox doctrine traced back to the apostles?
2. As did its [[Mother Church]], does the new [[Synod]] adhere to, teach, and preserve genuine the True Faith, genuine Orthodoxy, [[Holy Tradition]]?
3. Are the bishops obedient to their Synod and themselves confessing the True Faith?
On all counts the Milan Synod is found within these criteria. While inter-communion between Synods is always a good thing there are three reasons a Synod may not be in communion with others:
1. Because one of the above three criteria is not present. (Example: Old Calendar Greek Church who separated from
Greek Church due to its adoption of the revised calendar and subsequent ecumenism with non-Orthodox.)
2. Or because one Synod has separated herself from another in order to preserve the True Faith. (Example: Old Constantinople/Old Rome, Old Calendar Church/State Church, MP/ROCOR in its origins, etc.)
3. Or due to the highly politicized state of inter-Orthodox relations between various jurisdiction that happens from time to time.
When the Georgian Patriarchate was going to enter into communion with the Milan Synod the Ecumenical Patriarch violated canonical limitations by interfering with out dialog. Some believe that the Ecumenical Patriarch feared Vatican reprisals because of Milan’s presence in Europe, in much the same way that the Ecumenical Patriarch discourages proselytizing in England in order not to offend their ecumenical dialog partners, the Church of England. Yet, at the time, his Grace Patriarch Illia, told the Milan Synod that he considers them the only canonical jurisdiction today to have survived the Greek Old Calendar Church controversy. Furthermore, the [[Orthodox Church in America]], the [[Church of Poland]], the [[Moscow Patriarchate]], Ecumenical Patriarchate and others have taken in former Milan clergy & bishops without ever re-ordaining them, A sign of their genuine canonical standing.
The Synod of Milan maintains that it is a canonically established Metropolia, dedicated to Moderate Traditionalism, because it stays away from the extremes of fundamentalism on the one hand and ecumenism on the other hand by loving both non-Traditional Orthodox and heterodox, welcoming heterodox into the One and only Holy Apostolic
Church, wishing only to distance themselves from anything which would imply that the Orthodox Church is anything less that the One visible Body of Christ on Earth
Retrieved from "