Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Panagia Blachernitissa

919 bytes added, 00:36, February 15, 2008
no edit summary
So if "Blachernitissa" and "[[Panagia Vlacharnea|Vlacharnea]]" refer to the same thing, then am I correct that the Vlacharnea article needs to be merged here? Vasiliki, your articles get discussed so much, I think, because we are excited about getting so much new and interesting material. We are trying to make things easier for you by showing you how to hone your editing skills at the same time as improving the articles and the wiki as a whole. —[[User:Magda|<b>magda</b>]] ([[User_talk:Magda|talk]]) 16:27, February 14, 2008 (PST)
::Oh, I see what you were asking now ..there were two articles! I completely forgot I started off as Vlacharnea ... Gees. I know what happened. DCAndrew referred me off to the DEC page ... then I must have noticed that the standardised naming convention their was Blachernitissa and then started the article again ...forgetting I had the other one (I must slow down the number of tasks I do ...I know I am on speed but I hate making these mistakes). So, the question now is ...which one to merge in to? Personally I like the [[Panagia Blachernae]] article to remain because the extension more closely resembles the actual name of the suburb of Blachernai in Constantinople ... but on the other hand the DEC page has her as Blachernitissa. I will update this link with the other articles information ..and then I suppose you guys can resolve which to keep. -- [[User:Ixthis888|Vasiliki]] 16:36, February 14, 2008 (PST)

Navigation menu