User contributions
January 22, 2011
January 9, 2011
October 30, 2009
May 4, 2009
April 29, 2009
April 21, 2009
April 20, 2009
March 19, 2009
March 18, 2009
March 17, 2009
Talk:Ecumenical Councils
no edit summary
+236
Category talk:Church Fathers
no edit summary
+370
Category talk:Church Fathers
no edit summary
+287
Category talk:Church Fathers
no edit summary
+115
Category talk:Church Fathers
New page: == Non-Chalcedonian Fathers == Is it appropriate for Fathers particular to the Non-Chalcedonian tradition (Jacob of Serugh, Severus of Antioch, etc.) to be listed in the Church Fathers ca...
Severus of Antioch
no edit summary
-183
Dioscorus of Alexandria
no edit summary
-22
Severus of Antioch
New page: '''Severus''', Patriarch of Antioch (AD 512 - 518), born approximately 465 in Sozopolis in Pisidia, was by birth and education a pagan, who was ...
March 16, 2009
March 14, 2009
March 13, 2009
Dioscorus of Alexandria
no edit summary
+106
Talk:Dioscorus of Alexandria
no edit summary
+957
Talk:Dioscorus of Alexandria
no edit summary
+158
Talk:Dioscorus of Alexandria
no edit summary
+872
Talk:Dioscorus of Alexandria
no edit summary
+449
Dioscorus of Alexandria
no edit summary
+5
Talk:Dioscorus of Alexandria
no edit summary
+167
Talk:Dioscorus of Alexandria
New page: == Eutyches == It is fairly misleading to suggest that Eutyches seeming "redemption" at the Second Council of Ephesus is the final chapter in the story for the Oriental Orthodox. On the c...
March 10, 2009
March 9, 2009
Talk:Hypostatic union
no edit summary
+379
Talk:Miaphysitism
no edit summary
+2,723
Talk:Miaphysitism
no edit summary
+984
Talk:Hypostatic union
no edit summary
+1,292
Talk:Miaphysitism
no edit summary
+626
Talk:Miaphysitism
no edit summary
+359
Talk:Hypostatic union
no edit summary
+646
Talk:Miaphysitism
no edit summary
+518
Talk:Hypostatic union
no edit summary
+2,025
Talk:Miaphysitism
New page: == Exclusively Non-Chalcedonian? == Wouldn't it be more correct to say that Miaphysitism is also a secondary Christology of the Chalcedonian churches on the basis of the definitions of the...
Talk:Hypostatic union
no edit summary
+14
Talk:Hypostatic union
New page: Is it really theologically correct to say that Jesus Christ "subsists in two natures"? I know that this is actually not what the Chalcedonian Creed said. It said rather "recognized in two ...