Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Problems with the Chalcedonian Formula

26 bytes added, 18:58, November 5, 2008
m
add link
praised by Nestorius himself [1], and that the Tome, if taken alone by itself
could have created the impression of an excessive opposition of two natures, as
Prof. Rev. [[Georges Florovsky |Florovsky]] says[2].
3. Kelly states that, unlike, their brethren in the East, the Westerns were
or no contribution to christological theology[3].
4. We are in accord with the Tome in refuting [[Eutychianism ]] and in confirming that
Christ's manhood was real, Christ entered the mundane plane of existence and that
the unity of Godhead and manhood had been realized without change... but the Tome

Navigation menu