Difference between revisions of "OrthodoxWiki talk:Buzz"
(bZZZ..............) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Hmm... "Reviews" is too formal, I think, for what we're trying to do here. I like "chatter" because of the sense of the din of background noise... but I can appreciate your point (although I'm not sure how high the risk of mistake is if the link is accompanied by a description, as it is on the Community Portal). Any other ideas though besides "review"? [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] | ::Hmm... "Reviews" is too formal, I think, for what we're trying to do here. I like "chatter" because of the sense of the din of background noise... but I can appreciate your point (although I'm not sure how high the risk of mistake is if the link is accompanied by a description, as it is on the Community Portal). Any other ideas though besides "review"? [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::"Buzz", perhaps? --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 17:03, 31 Jan 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Buzz would be fine if you thinks its better! [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:15, January 31, 2005
I don't mean to "out" anybody. Please feel free to delete or change your comments or links if you aren't comfortable with them. FrJohn 15:09, 25 Jan 2005 (CST)
Move proposal
I propose we move this page to OrthodoxWiki:Reviews or something along those lines. The current name might give the impression of being a page dedicated to discussion. --Rdr. Andrew 20:27, 30 Jan 2005 (CST)
- Hmm... "Reviews" is too formal, I think, for what we're trying to do here. I like "chatter" because of the sense of the din of background noise... but I can appreciate your point (although I'm not sure how high the risk of mistake is if the link is accompanied by a description, as it is on the Community Portal). Any other ideas though besides "review"? Fr. John
- "Buzz", perhaps? --Rdr. Andrew 17:03, 31 Jan 2005 (CST)
- Buzz would be fine if you thinks its better! Fr. John
