Difference between revisions of "John (Zizioulas) of Pergamon"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Not a problem. Different understanding of the article added to the criticism section and additional explanation provided. If the author unconsciously criticized J.Z. well… too bad. He has done it.)
m (Academic and Theological: Fixed one reference wording)
Line 35: Line 35:
 
* Denial of the representation of the Orthodoxy by John Zizioulas can be found in the article published by the editorial staff of the magazine [http://www.italiaortodossa.it Italia Ortodossa], a magazine of Orthodox faithful in Italy: [http://digilander.libero.it/ortodossia/Zizioulas.htm Is the Theologian Ioannis Zizioulas proclaiming Orthodoxy?]
 
* Denial of the representation of the Orthodoxy by John Zizioulas can be found in the article published by the editorial staff of the magazine [http://www.italiaortodossa.it Italia Ortodossa], a magazine of Orthodox faithful in Italy: [http://digilander.libero.it/ortodossia/Zizioulas.htm Is the Theologian Ioannis Zizioulas proclaiming Orthodoxy?]
  
* Peter J. Leithart's article, [http://www.leithart.com/archives/002006.php ''Divine Energies and Orthodox Soteriology''], cites this work, noting Papanikolaou points out where [[Vladimir Lossky]] and Metropolitan John (Zizioulas) differ on the issue of [[divine energies]]. His article implies criticism, based on understanding of the certain Orthodox, who see work of [[Vladimir Lossky|Prof. Lossky]] as contemporary synthesis of the patristic theology. To differ from [[Vladimir Lossky|Prof. Lossky]], is to differ from patristic theology.
+
* Peter J. Leithart's article, [http://www.leithart.com/archives/002006.php ''Divine Energies and Orthodox Soteriology''], cites the work of Papanikolaou, and points out where [[Vladimir Lossky]] and Metropolitan John (Zizioulas) differ on the issue of [[divine energies]]. His article implies criticism, based on understanding of the certain Orthodox, who see work of [[Vladimir Lossky|Prof. Lossky]] as contemporary synthesis of the patristic theology. Thus, to differ from [[Vladimir Lossky|Prof. Lossky]], is to differ from patristic theology.
  
 
===Regarding Ecumenical Relations===
 
===Regarding Ecumenical Relations===

Revision as of 19:58, March 6, 2008

Metropolitan John (Zizioulas) of Pergamon

His Eminence John (Zizioulas) of Pergamon (b. 1930) is a modern theologian, Metropolitan of Pergamon, Greece, under the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. He was consecrated as a bishop on June 22, 1986, and is currently the co-chair of the Catholic-Orthodox dialogue.


This article or section is a stub (i.e., in need of additional material). You can help OrthodoxWiki by expanding it.


Biographical timeline

  • 1930: The future metropolitan is born.
  • 1986 Jun 22: Archim. John is consecrated a bishop.
  • Became a key figure in major ecumenical dialogues between the Orthodox Church and other Christian traditions.
  • Leading theologian in a theology of ecology, played a central role in making the Orthodox Church one of the most active religious religious communities involved with development and environmental issues.
  • Held professorships at Glasgow University and King's College, London.
  • 2006: Succeeded Archbishop Stylianos of Australia as president of the Commission of Orthodox in the Dialogue with the Roman Catholic Church.

Books

  • Being and Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimirs Seminary Press, 1997)
  • Eucharist, Bishop, Church: The Unity of the Church in the Divine Eucharist and the Bishop During the First Three Centuries (Brookline, MA: Holy Cross, 2001)
  • Communion & Otherness: Further Studies in Personhood and the Church (London: T & T Clark, 2007)

Studies

  • Fox, Patricia A. God as Communion: John Zizioulas, Elizabeth Johnson, and the Retrieval of the Symbol of the Triune God (Michael Glazer, 2001)
  • Knight, Douglas, ed. The Theology of John Zizioulas: Personhood and the Church (Ashgate, 2007)
  • Papanikolaou, Aristotle. Being with God: Trinity, Apophaticism, and Divine-Human Communion (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006)
Peter J. Leithart's article, Divine Energies and Orthodox Soteriology, cites this work, noting Papanikolaou points out where Vladimir Lossky and Metropolitan John (Zizioulas) differ on the issue of divine energies.

Criticisms

Academic and Theological

Like many theologians, particularly those involved in theological dialogues, Metropolitan John has undergone criticism for his theological works.

  • Rodoljub Lazic, in his book, Innovatory Theology of Metropolitan Zizioulas (In Serbian, ATOS - Missionary Center, Belgrade 2002), explains why he believes the work of Zizioulas differs from traditional Orthodoxy and argues that there is a connection between Zizioulas' ecumenical orientation and his theology.

Regarding Ecumenical Relations

External links


Succession box:
John (Zizioulas) of Pergamon
Preceded by:
?
Metropolitan of Pergamon
1986 - present
Succeeded by:
Help with box