The Fourth Crusade lasted from 1201-1204. Though the crusades were for the most part an entirely Western phenomenon, this one affected church history because the invading force of Crusaders took Constantinople on April 13, 1204. After defeating the Byzantine Emperor Alexius V (who had usurped the throne from his predecessor Alexius IV, put in power by the Crusaders), they conquered the city and famously looted and desecrated numerous churches, icons, and relics.1 They then set up the Latin Empire, based in Constantinople; it lasted over 57 years until the Byzantine Michael VIII Palaeologus recaptured Constantinople in 1261. This Crusade is widely regarding as having to finalized the Great Schism, as much bitterness towards the West remained even after the restoration of Byzantium.
Factors Contributing to the Diversion of the Fourth Crusade
1. Papal Primacy as developed during the Cluniac Reformation (10th-11th c.); and the Gregorian Reform of Pope Gregory VII.
The Monastery of Cluny in French Burgundy taught the high doctrine of the power of the Apostolic See. The Church was to be organized under strict discipline, and Bishops, Priests, and Monks had no rights of their own that were not derived from the Pope, the unique source of ecclesiastical authority. In 1039 Cluny's abbot Odilo turned his monastery into the head of a monastic feudal system whose influence spread all over Europe. In 1055 the monastery of Cluny captured the papacy. Pope Innocent III (Pope during the Fourth Crusade) carried these Cluniac ideas about the position of the Pope as the sole and highest authority in the Church.
It naturally followed therefore, that Pope Gregory VII (1073-85) conceived of his supremacy over the temporal powers, as a domination over the Eastern and Western Empires. The Gregorian Reform stressed, among other things, the primacy of the papacy over the Empire, the infallability of the Church, and the right of Popes to depose Emperors.
With this background, and with the experience of the Great Schism in 1054, the Papacy's position was that Byzantium was regarded as a rebel, a schismatic or heretic nation which should be brought back to order or eliminated.
2. Resentment the West had long felt against Eastern Christendom
The average European, especially those who lived in the northern territories and had no communication or knowledge of the Byzantine Empire, were taught to believe that the Greeks were ungodly, a nation not worthy to bear the name of Christians. Two examples are:
- in the Chronicle of the Morea (a 14th Century text naarating the establishment of western style feudalism in Frankish Greece), there is a speech recorded which clearly shows the feelings of the Latins against the Greeks; the Papal Legate at Zara (1202) stated: "It is better to brings Christians into agreement and like-mindedness, the Franks and the Greeks, than go to Syria with no hope of success."(Chronicle of Morea p.82).
- In the acccount of the second crusade (1147-49), De profectione Ludovici VII in Orientem (On Louis VII's journey to the East), written by Odo of Deuil, a chaplain to the French King Louis VII and later Abbott of Saint-Denis, Odo explains the failure of the crusade in terms of human action rather than as the will of God. Odo blamed the Byzantine Empire under Manuel Comnenus for the downfall of the crusade. Odo's prejudice against Byzantium led historian Steven Runciman to describe Odo as hysterically anti-Greek.
3. Byzatium was regarded by the average crusader as a traitor to Christendom, in that it had consistently been hindering the Crusades, which were viewed by crusaders as the holy cause of the liberation of the Holy Places from the infidel.
- Emperor Alexius I Comnenus helped the First Crusade but was very cautious, signing an uneasy treaty and alliance with the crusaders.
- Emperor Manuel I Comnenus promised to help the Second Crusade, and signed the same treaty with the crusaders. However he could not help because he was engaged in war against the Norman Prince Roger of Sicily who had invaded Corfu. Manuel had also signed a treaty with the Turks of Iconium; the crusaders, particularly the Franks, bitterly blamed him for their failure.
- Emperor Isaac II Angelus foolishly imprisoned the ambassadors of Emperor Frederick I Barbarossa (Hohenstauffen), head of the Third Crusade, who were sent to negotiate passage through Imperial territory. Issac also had concluded a treaty with the Sultan of Iconium, as he was fearful of Frederick's ambitions.
The fact is that Constantinople was always suspicious of these Western hordes, sometime quite unruly, which were passing through its territory full of bigotry and fanaticism against the Islamic nations neighboring the Empire. Besides, the policy of the Byzantine Empire in handling the Moslems and keeping them away was quite opposite to the Crusaders ideals and blind religious fanaticism. Historian Queller, quoting Runciman says that "the concept of Christian War appears to be alien to the thought and personality of Jesus, and in fact, it was not looked upon favorably by the Greek Church."
4. Commercial Rivalries: Venice had the goal of controlling the very important parts of the Empire for the benefit of her trade.
5. Western Envy
Envy for the apparent wealth of the Greeks and perhaps the desire to share in some of the precious holy relics and treasure in the Churches of the imperial capital. The primary sources of the first crusade speak of the awe the crusaders felt when they first glanced at the Imperial City and the domes of Hagia Sophia; the feeling of inferiority is openly discerned as being at work in the crusaders as a result. More to the point, in both of the accounts of Villehardouin, and that of the crusader knight Robert of Clari (4th crusade), the impression of the crusaders is recorded, about the unbelievable wealth and the treasure of the holy relics of Constantinople that it made upon the crusaders of the Fourth Crusade.
6. Bitter Memories
- There were bitter memories of recent Byzantine attacks on Westerners (in Sicily, West Greece(1098), and in Antioch during the First Crusade).
- 1149: The King of France Louis VII supported the suggestion that a European League should launch a new crusade against the Emperor who was "Christian Only in Name." The capture of Constantinople should be the crusaders first objective. The Norman Roger of Sicily was in support of the idea, and his ally, Pope Eugenius III was hesitant only because he feared the possible increase of Roger's power.
- 1171: Emperor Manuel, having concluded alliances with Pisa and Genoa, decided to strike at Venice by arresting all Venetians in the Empire and confiscating all their ships and goods, symbolizing the degeneration of the empire's relationship with the west and between Latins and Greeks in Constantinople.
- 1183-85: during the reign of Emperor Andronicus I Comnenus, there was a great massacre of Italians in Constantinople, and all commerical concessions were withdrawn. Andronicus made many enemies, and was overthrown by riots in Constantinople.
- 1185: Normans take Thessaloniki and subject inhabitants to merciless treatment, partly for revenge of the massacre of Latins in 1183.
- 1189: The Third Crusade (1189), headed by German King Frederick Barbarossa, an enemy of Byzantium, was almost turned against Constantinople. The folly of Isaac I in imprisoning Frederick's ambassadors enraged the crusaders. They occupied Philippopolis in Thrace, and Frederick wrote to his son Henry to send a fleet and attack the capital. He also wrote to the Pope for his blessing, stating that it was necessary to eliminate the Empire if they were going to have any success in their enterprise against the Moslems. Negotiations by Isaac and a treaty averted the danger at that time.
- 1191: Cyprus taken from Byzantines by English King Richard I "Lion Heart", who sells it in 1198 to Frankish crusaders from previous crusades who had been ousted from Jerusalem in 1187 by the Arabs who had retaken Jerusalem after 88 years.
- 1197: Henry VI, son of Frederick Barbarossa, made no secret of his hatred of Byzantium and his ambitions to build a Mediterranean dominion. In 1197 a German expedition landed at Acre in Palestine; it was to be the forerunner of a greater army led by Henry himself. Pope Celestine III made no attempt to dissuade him but he advised him not to attack Constantinople because he was negotiating with the Emperor the Union of the Churches. Henry's sudden death at 32 put an end to this German expedition.
Chronology of the Fourth Crusade (Diversion of the Fourth Crusade)
Nov. 1198 - The popular preacher Fulk of Neuilly is commissioned by Pope Innocent III to preach the crusade.
28 Nov. 1199 - At the tournament in Ecry, many young counts take the cross: Thibald of Champagne (leader), Louis of Blois, Simon de Montfort, Reynald of Montmirail, etc.
23 Feb. 1200 - Baldwin of Flanders takes the cross. - shortly thereafter - at a meeting in Soissons, it was decided to delay the Crusade due to lack of support (manpower). - 2 months later - at Compiegne - it was decided to take the sea route to the East. A group of 6 envoys were sent to Venice to negotiate this. Geoffroy de Villehardouin (author of "Chronicles of the Crusades") was one of these.
Feb. 1201 - Ducal Council of Doge Enrico Dandolo of Venice. It was decided that the fleet was to be ready by 29 June 1202.
June 1201 - at Soissons, Boniface of Montferrat takes the cross and he is made leader of the Crusade.
c.Sept. 1201 - Alexius IV (son of deposed Emperor Isaac) escapes Constantinople and reaches the West - specifically, Phillip of Swabia's Christmas court in Hagenau Germany.
Late Summer/Autumn 1201 - Boniface of Montferrat arrives at Hagenau:
(Possibility of Phillip of Swabia, Alexius IV, and Boniface of Montferrat discussing a change in direction for the Crusade = diversion of the fourth crusade).
Feb. 1202 - Alexius speaks to Pope Innocent III.
March 1202 - Boniface speaks with Pope Innocent III.
15 Aug. 1202 - Boniface joins the army in Venice.
Early Autumn 1202 - too few crusaders show up; great debt owed to Venice.
1 Oct. 1202 - Army sets out for the Dalmatian coast, city of Zara.
After 10 Nov.1202 - a letter of Pope Innocent III forbids the crusaders to attack any Christian city, and he names Zara by name, since the king of that city had also taken the cross.
11-24 Nov. 1202 - Siege of Zara. The city is sacked.
After 24 Nov.1202 - The Pope excomminicates the Crusaders, but shortly thereafter absolves them all (except the Venetians), in order to prevent the breakup of the crusade.
Dec. 1202 - Boniface arrives at Zara.
Dec. 1202 - Envoys of Phillip of Swabia arrive in Zara, and present the proposal of Alexius IV to the Crusade leaders -- for them to restore Alexius to the throne in exhcange for a list of hefty concessions.
24 May 1203 - The crusaders depart from Corfu, after having ratified the proposal of Alexius IV, in Alexius' presence, by oath. Alexius accompanies the crusaders from here on.
24 June 1203 - Arrival before the walls of Constantinople.
18 June 1203 - FIRST SEIGE of Constantinople. The city falls. First fire in the city. Alexius III flees, and then Alexius IV and Isaac are crowned co-emperors.
August 1203 - Delays in payment by Alexius IV to the crusaders detains them in Constantinople. They end up wintering over in the city, instead of leaving for Egypt .
Dec. 1203 - Jan.1204 - Riots in the city. Second fire in the city.
28 Jan. 1204 - A coup d'etat by Murtzuphlus who crowns himself Alexius V.
8 April, 1204 - SECOND SIEGE of Constantinople begins.
12 April, 1204 - The city falls. A great sack follows. Alexius V flees secretly. Third great fire in the city.
16 May, 1204 - Baldwin of Flanders is crowned the first Latin emperor of the new "Latin Empire of Consatantinople (Romania)"
((These dates were largely taken from Jonathan Riley-Smith, and Niketas Choniates))
Speros Vryonis in "Byzantium and Europe" gives a vivid account of the sack of Constantinople, by the Frankish and Venetian Crusaders of the Fourth Crusade:
- "The Latin soldiery subjected the greatest city in Europe to an indescribable sack. For three days they murdered, raped, looted and destroyed on a scale which even the ancient Vandals and Goths would have found unbelievable. Constantinople had become a veritable museum of ancient and Byzantine art, an emporium of such incredible wealth that the Latins were astounded at the riches they found. Though the Venetians had an appreciation for the art which they discovered (they were themselves semi-Byzantines) and saved much of it, the French and others destroyed indiscriminately, halting to refresh themselves with wine, violation of nuns, and murder of Orthodox clerics. The Crusaders vented their hatred for the Greeks most spectacularly in the desecration of the greatest Church in Christendom. They smashed the silver iconostasis, the icons and the holy books of Hagia Sophia, and seated upon the patriarchal throne a Whore who sang coarse songs as they drank wine from the Church's holy vessels. The estrangement of east and west, which had proceeded over the centuries, culminated in the horrible massacre that accompanied the conquest of Constantinople. The Greeks were convinced that even the Turks, had they taken the city, would not have been as cruel as the Latin Christians. The defeat of Byzantium, already in a state of decline, accelerated political degeneration so that the Byzantines eventually became an easy prey to the Turks. The Crusading movement thus resulted, ultimately, in the victory of Islam, a result which was of course the exact opposite of its original intention." (Vryonis, Byzantium and Europe, p.152).
Sir Edward Gibbon stated that the spoil taken during one week in Constantinople equalled seven times the whole revenue of England at that time (Treece). The four magnificent bronze horses over the portals of San Marco's basilica in Venice, were snatched from the Byzantine hippodrome, standing monuments of one of the greatest acts of brigandage in history.
Its hard to exaggerate the harm done to European civilization by the sack of Constantinople. The treasures of the city, the books and works of art preserved from distant centuries, were all dispersed and most destroyed. The Empire, the great Eastern bulwark of Christendom, was broken as a power. The conquests of the Ottomans were made possible by the Crusaders' crime.(Runciman, p.46).
A Roman Catholic Patriarch was established and an attempt to introduce Roman Catholicism by force. The new Venetian Patriarch in Constantinople, "Morosini", was appointed by the Doge of Venice Dandolo (the main person who engineered the diversion of the Fourth Crusade). Morosini appealed to the Pope for aid, and being unable to serve so many derisive masters, he died a madman. The new Papal legate, "Pelagius", rode into Constantinople dressed in scarlet from head to foot, like a Greek Emperor himself, and soon asserted that the easy days were over: Thenceforth the Greek clergy must adapt themselves in all religious rites and beliefs to those of the Church of Rome. He was prepared to wade through blood, he quickly showed, should the Orthodox Greeks deny any part of his assertion.(Treece, pp.230-231)
Papal Apology to Orthodox Church May 4, 2001 -- Pope Apologizes to Orthodox Church
The Papal visit to Athens, Greece was the first in nearly 1300 Years. Pope John Paul II and Archbishop Christodoulos met at the Aereopagus Hill, where the Apostle Paul preached to Athenians 2000 years ago. Pope John Paul II stated: "For Occassions Past and Present, when the sons and daughters of the Catholic Church have sinned by actions and omission against their Orthodox brothers and sisters, may the Lord grant us the forgiveness we beg of Him." Many Orthodox regard this as a 'political' apology for the sacking of Constantinople in 1204, as well as for other issues, but it was clearly not in any way or form a 'religious/doctrinal' apology on the part of the Roman Catholic Church.
- Wikipedia:Fourth Crusade
- The Sack of Constantinople - by Nicholas A. Cooke
- 1 Nicetas Choniates: The Sack of Constantinople (1204) - from the Medieval Sourcebook
- The Cambridge Medieval History: Vol. IV-The Byzantine Empire: Part 1-Byzantium and Its Neighbours.
- Riley-Smith, Jonathan. The Crusades: A Short History. Great Britian, 1987.
- Vryonis, Speros. Byzantium and Europe. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York, c1967.
- Runciman, Steven. Byzantine Civilization. Cleveland World Publ. Co. 1965.
- Treece, Henry. The Crusades. London, 1962.
- Atiya, Aziz A. Crusade, Commerce and Culture. Indiana University Press, 1962.
- Hussey, J.M. The Impact of East and West 1204-1453: Latin Treachery and Byzantine Diplomacy 1204-1261, In The Byzantine World, 1961.
- Ostrogorsky, George. The Byzantine State. Transl. Joan Hussey. Rutgers, 1969.
- Schmandt, Raymond. The Fourth Crusade and the Just War Theory. (article).
- Gregoire, Henri. The Question of the Diversion of the Fourth Crusade. (article).
- Morris, Colin. Geoffrey De Villehardouin and the Conquest of Constantinople. (article).
- Folda, J. "The Fourth Crusade 1201-1203: Some Reconsiderations." in Byzantino-Slavica 26(1965),pp.227-290.
- Joinville and Villehardouin. Chronicles of the Crusades. Transl, M.R.B. Shaw. Penguin Books, 1963.
- Odo of Deuill. De Profectione Ludovici VII in Orientem (The Journey of Louis VII to the East). Transl Virginia Gingerick Berry. New York, 1948.
- Niketas Choniates. O City of Byzantium, Annals of Niketas Choniates. Detroit 1984.
- Robert de Clari. The Conquest of Constantinople. Transl. Edgar Holmes McNeal, University of Toronto Press, 1996.
- The Chronicle of Morea : a history in political verse, relating to the establishment of feudalism in Greece by the Franks in the thirteenth century. Ed. John Schmitt (1856-1906). Groningen : Bouma's Bockhuis, 1967