Open main menu

OrthodoxWiki β

Changes

User talk:Joe Rodgers

765 bytes added, 13:25, January 19, 2011
no edit summary
== IRC [[Deanery]] ==
Thanks to Kevin Basil, Were you aware that your source (La Crosse) is Roman Catholic? I can be found quite often don't know whether it makes any difference in the #orthodoxy channel on lplugdefinition of a deanery, but I thought I should point it out anyway.org. Talk to me there if you would like. I go by the name {{User:Magda/sig}} 07:41, January 19, WPU.2006 (CST)
Don't know about IRC? You could learn [http://blogYes I was. I am certainly not against Catholic, Protestant, or anything for that matter, when it coincides with truth.kevinbasilI was not able to find a reasonable online source from an Orthodox perspective and thought that these words were appropriate for Orthodox deaneries as well.com/2003/02/03/holy-irc-batman/ if you want[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe].] 20060119
== Talk pages Pic ==
I don't much mind what you do with your own Talk page, but would you mind not erasing those of other articles? It's helpful Nice to see where we've been and why we've done what we've done. you Joe! {{User:FrJohn/sig}}
(Please forgive me if And you know, somehow I seem needling and naggingthought you were older than you appear to be. :) —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 1716:4739, January 19, 28 Jun 2005 2006 (EDTCST)
: == Menologion ==Joe, this is Aleks. I will gladly abide by the decision of the sysopsgot you message recently. What is everyone elseCan you elaborate in an e-mail on what exactly you's opinionre interested in making? I talked with another sysop (think it would be great to have Menologion and OW work together, but I won't mention their name) who seemed want to agree that things get a little cluttered, cloudy, or outdated in discussion pagesfigure out the logistics first.
: My own thoughts are that if articles can be trimmed and made more concise== Hi ==Dear Joe, why can't talk pages? I like having an archiveThanks (belatedly) for your welcome note!Best, but if a situation has been addressed then I personally think it makes things cluttered to keep them around. The discussion is archived in the changelog/history. My two cents. --[[User:Joe RodgersMaxim|Joe RodgersMaxim]] 1812:5439, June 28 Jun 2005 , 2006 (EDTCDT)
Wikipedia's usual approach (not that we have to do everything they do) is to make archival subpages when the given talk page gets too long. Sorting through a history can be extremely difficult and time consuming, especially if one isn't looking for something in particular but rather simply wants to know what the discussion regarding a given article has been.== Your sig ==
I don've noticed that your sig isn't think this has ever been discussed between the sysopscoming out quite right when you sign posts. I'm just ''one'' of them and by no means chief among them. We can certainly put it up for discussionIf you want to use the template approach, though, which Iyou've done ll need to check the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box in your preferences on [[OrthodoxWiki:Administrators]]the "User profile" tab. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|{{User<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</sig}}font>]] 19</sup> 15:0923, August 10, 28 Jun 2005 2006 (EDTCDT)
:I think one reason to keep a record of resolved issues is that others who think of similar (or the same) issues can see for themselves that it has been resolved, without having to rehash arguments, for instance when a style decision has been made. —[[User:Magda|magda]] 20:27, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)== IRC Channel still up? ==
Hi Joe, I just checked up on the IRC channel and I received the following messages:: Good point MagdaChanServ changed this room to require operator status to change the topic. However(11:46AM)<br>[11:46AM] ChanServ made this room no longer a secret. (11:46AM) <br>[11:46AM] You were demoted from operator by ChanServ. (11:46AM) <br> Given my IRC inexperience, maybe this is nothing to worry about - just normal, but I think that if the style decision wanted to make sure our channel is still up and running in good standing, not quashed due to inactivity. What is explicit enough it could detail the reasons why a decision was made freenode policy on this?  Thanks! — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk]) 09:49, May 26, 2007 (PDT) == Active appeal == There's currently an active appeal over anotherat [[OrthodoxWiki talk:Administrators]]. If as an admin, you would like to participate, please feel free to do so. -- Thanks! &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:Joe RodgersASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|Joe RodgersTHINK!]] 20''')</font></small> 16:5901, 28 Jun 2005 August 19, 2008 (EDTUTC)  == Hi, I'm Italian == I hope in Orthodox in Italian... i'll writing in Italian... about Ortodossia!!
292
edits