Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Great Schism

395 bytes added, 02:10, December 12, 2008
Major rewrite needed
:Agree, although some of that article is contentious. W:user:Lima is causing some trouble there with frequent reverts, re-edits, and non-collaborative single-minded behaviour. [[User:Chrisg|Chrisg]] 14:37, December 11, 2008 (UTC)
::I am not an expert on writing "Encyclopedically" however i am good at reading and understanding and it is my personal opinion that the way this article is WORDED is written in a 'persuasive' tone rather than an encyclopedic/neutral tone ... its almost like you are being pushed to be convinced of an idea that has no back up with Church historical documentation. An example is the following:
== Neither "formerly" nor "formally" ==
A change was made that said: "AD 1054 is the date formerly given for the split between East and West." If "formerly" is meant, it is wrong in that many still give that date. It it was a typo and "formally" was meant, that is wrong, too, as it wasn't finally accomplished for two centuries. --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 01:52, December 12, 2008 (UTC)

Navigation menu