Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Clement of Alexandria

838 bytes removed, 17:29, October 22, 2012
m
Category
[[Image:ClemensVonAlexandrien.jpg|right|240px]]
'''Clement of Alexandria''' (Titus Flavius Clemens), was the first member well-known theologian of the [[Church of Alexandria to be more than a name, and one of its most distinguished teachers]]. He was born about the middle of the 2nd century, and died between 211 and 216.
==Life==
He was not born in Egypt (''Stromata'', i. 1)as his name suggests; rather, Alexandria was his bishopric. Athens is named as his birthplace by the sixth-century Epiphanius Scholasticus, and this is supported by the classical quality of his Greek. His parents seem to have been wealthy pagans of some social standing. The thoroughness of his education is shown by his constant quotation of the Greek poets and philosophers. He travelled traveled in Greece, Italy, Palestine, and finally Egypt. He became the colleague of Pantaenus, the head of the [[Catechetical School of Alexandria]]and the man who likely converted him to Christianity, and finally succeeded him in the direction of the school. One of his most popular pupils His best known pupil was [[Origen]] (who was condemned by the [[Fifth Ecumenical Council]]. During the persecution of Septimius Severus (202 or 203) he sought refuge with Alexander, then [[bishop [possibly ]] of Flaviada] in Cappadocia, afterward of [[Jerusalem]], from whom he brought a letter to [[Antioch]] in 211. After this, he died sometime in the next five years without returning to Egypt.
==Literary work==
The trilogy into which Clement's principal remains are connected by their purpose and mode of
treatment is composed of the ''Protrepticus'' ("Exhortation to the Greeks"), the ''Paedagogus'' ("Instructor"), and the ''Stromata'' ("Miscellanies"). Overbeck calls it the boldest literary undertaking in the history of the Church, since in In it Clement for the first time attempted to set forth Christianity for the faithful in the traditional forms of secular literature. The ''Protrepticus'' forms an introduction inviting the reader to listen, not to the mythical legends of the gods, but to the "new song" of the [[Jesus Christ|Logos]] (that is, Christ), the beginning of all things and creator of the world. He denounces what he claims to be the folly of idolatry and the pagan mysteries, the shamefulness of the pederastic practices of the Greeks, and the horrors of pagan sacrifice, and . Clement argues that the Greek philosophers and poets only guessed at the truth, while the prophets [[prophet]]s set forth a direct way to salvation; and now the divine Logos speaks in his own person, to awaken all that is good in the soul of man and to lead it to immortality. Having thus laid a foundation in the knowledge of divine truth, he goes on in the ''Paedagogus'' to develop a describe the Christian ethic. His design does not prevent him from taking a large part of his material from the Stoic Musonius Rufus, the master of Epictetus; but for Clement the real instructor is the incarnate Logos.
The first book deals with the religious basis of Christian morality, the second and third with the individual cases of conduct. As with Epictetus, true virtue shows itself with him in its external evidences by a natural, simple, and moderate way of living. The ''Stromata'' goes further and aims at the perfection of the Christian life by initiation into complete knowledge. The first of these works is addressed to the unconverted, the second to the new Christian, and the third appeals to the mature believer. It attempts, on the basis of [[Holy Scripture |Scripture]] and tradition[[Holy Tradition|Tradition]], to give such an account of the Christian faith as shall answer all the demands of learned men, and conduct the student into the innermost realities of his belief. Clement entitled this work ''Stromateis'', "patchwork," because it dealt with such a variety of matters. He intended to make but one book of this; at least seven grew out of it, without his having treated all the subjects proposed. The absence of certain things definitely promised has led scholars to ask whether he wrote an eighth book, as would appear from [[Eusebius of Caesarea|Eusebius]] (VI. xiii. 1) and the ''Florilegia'', and various attempts have been made to identify with it short or fragmentary treatises appearing among his remains. In any case , the "excerpts" and "selections" which, with part of a treatise on logical method, are designated as the eighth book in the single (11th century) manuscript of the ''Stromata'', are not parts of the ''Hypotyposes'' which Clement is known to have written. This work was a brief commentary on selected passages covering the whole Bible, as is shown in the fragments preserved by Oecumenius and in the Latin version of the commentary on the Catholic Epistles made at the instance request of a certain Cassiodorus.  Besides the great trilogy, the only complete another important work of Clement that has been preserved is the treatise "Who is the Rich Man that Shall Be Saved?" based on [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 10:17-31, and laying . This commentary lays down the principle that not the possession of riches , but their misuse , is to be condemned. There are extant a few We also have fragments of numerous other works, including: ''Exhortation to the treatise on the PassoverGreeks'', against the Quartodecimanism position ''The Instructor of Melito of SardisChildren'', and only a single passage from the "Ecclesiastical Canon" against the Judaizers. Several other works are known only by their titles''Hypotyposeis'' (''Sketches'').
==His significance for the Church==
The significance of Clement in the history of the development of doctrine is, according to Adolf Harnack, that he knew how to replace the apologetic method by the constructive or systematic, to turn the simple church tradition into a scientific dogmatic theology. It is a marked characteristic of 's most lasting impact was his that he sees only superficial and transient disagreement where others find a fundamental opposition. He is able attempt to reconcile, or even to fuse, differing views to an extent which makes it almost impossible to attribute to him a definite individual systemunite Greek pagan philosophy with Christianity. He is admittedly an eclectic (''Stromata'', i. 37). This attitude determines especially his treatment of non-Christian philosophy. Although the theory of a diabolical origin for it is not unknown to him, and although he shows exhaustively that the philosophers owe a large part of their knowledge to the writings of the [[Old Testament]], yet he seems to express and expresses his own personal conviction when he describes philosophy as a direct operation of the divine Logos, working through it as well as through the law and his direct revelation in the Gospel to communicate the truth to men. It is true that the knowledge of the philosophers was elementary, fragmentary, and incapable of imparting true righteousness; and it was far surpassed by the revelation given through the law and the prophets, as that again was still further surpassed by the direct revelation of the incarnate Logos; but this idea of relative inferiority does not prevent him from showing that his whole mental attitude is determined and dominated by the philosophical tradition.
Not all later ecclesiastics have been happy with Clement spend much time defining for Christians the originally pagan philosophical concept of the Logos, the principle of true Christian gnosis, through whom alone God's relation to the world and his viewsrevelation is maintained. While his feast day is traditionally God he considers transcendentally as unqualified Being, who can not be defined in too abstract a way (see [[December 4apophatic theology]]). Though his goodness operated in the creation of the world, Pope Benedict XIV removed Clement from yet immutability, self sufficiency, incapability of suffering are the characteristic notes of the Roman martyrology in 1748divine essence.
Thus he Clement emphasizes the permanent importance of philosophy for the fulness fullness of Christian knowledge, explains with special predilection the relation between knowledge and faith, and sharply criticizes those who are unwilling to make any use of philosophy. He pronounces definitely against the sophists and against the hedonism of the school of Epicurus. Although he generally expresses himself unfavorably in regard to the Stoic philosophy, he really pays marked deference to that mixture of Stoicism and Platonism which characterized the religious and ethical thought of the educated classes in his day. This explains the value set by Clement on ''gnosis''. To be sure, he constantly opposes the concept of ''gnosis'' as defined by the [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]]. Faith is the foundation of all ''gnosis'', and both are given by [[Christ]]. As faith involves a comprehensive knowledge of the essentials, knowledge allows the believer to penetrate deeply into the understanding of what he believes; and this is the making perfect, the completion, of faith. In order to attain this kind of faith, the "faith of knowledge," which is so much higher than the mere "faith of conjecture," or simple reception of a truth on authority, philosophy is permanently necessary. In fact, Christianity truly is the true a philosophy, and the perfect Christian is the true Gnostic -- —but again only the "Gnostic according to the canon of the Church ," has this distinction. Also, he rejects not as in the Gnostic distinction of "psychic" and "pneumatic" men; all are alike destined to perfection if they will embrace itheretical sect.
From philosophy he takes his conception of the Logos, Clement lays great stress on the principle fulfillment of Christian gnosis, through whom alone God's relation to the world and moral obligations. In his revelation ethical expressions he is maintained. God he considers transcendentally as unqualified Being, who can not be defined in too abstract a way. Though his goodness operated in influenced strongly by Plato and the creation of the worldStoics, yet immutability, self sufficiency, incapability from whom he borrows much of suffering are the characteristic notes of the divine essencehis terminology. Though He praises Plato for setting forth the Logos is most closely one with the Father, whose powers he resumes in himself, yet greatest possible likeness to Clement both God as the Son aim of life; and the Spirit are "first-born powers and first created"; they form the highest stages in the scale his portrait of intelligent being, and Clement distinguishes the Son-Logos from the Logos who is immutably immanent in God, and thus gives a foundation to the charge of Photius perfect Gnostic closely resembles that he "degraded the Son to the rank of a creature." Separate from the world wise man as drawn by the principle of creation, Stoics. Hence he is yet in it as its guiding principle. Thus a natural life is a life according counsels his readers to shake off the will chains of the Logos. The Incarnationflesh as far as possible, in spite of Clement's rejection to live already as if out of the Gnostic [[Docetism]]body, has with him a decidedly Docetic character. The body of Christ was not subject and thus to human needsrise above earthly things. He is a true Greek in the good Physician; the medicine value which he offers is the communication of saving ''gnosis'', leading men from paganism to faith and from faith to the higher state sets on moderation; but his highest ideal of knowledge. This true philosophy includes within itself conduct remains the freedom from sin and the attainment mortification of virtue. As all sin has its root affections which may in ignorance, so any way disturb the knowledge of God and of goodness is followed by well-doing. Against the Gnostics Clement emphasizes the freedom of all to do goodsoul in its career.
The way to union with God ([[theosis]]) is for Clement lays great stress on only the fulfilment of moral obligationsChurch's way. In his ethical expressions he is influenced strongly by Plato and the Stoics, from whom he borrows much The simple faith of his terminology. He praises Plato for setting forth the greatest possible likeness to God as baptized Christian contains all the aim essentials of lifethe highest knowledge; and his portrait of the perfect Gnostic closely resembles that of the wise man as drawn by the Stoics. Hence he counsels his readers to shake off [[Eucharist]] the chains of believer is united with the flesh as far as possible, to live already as if out of Logos and the bodySpirit, and thus to rise above earthly things. He is a true Greek in the value which he sets on moderation; but his highest ideal of conduct remains the mortification of all affections which may in any way disturb the soul in its career. As Harnack says, the lofty ethical-religious ideal of the attainment made partaker of man's perfection in union with God, which Greek philosophy from Plato down had worked out, and to which it hadsubordinated all scientific worldly knowledge, is taken over by Clement, deepened in meaning, and connected not only with Christ, but with ecclesiastical traditionincorruptibility.
The way, however, ==Charges of heresy==According to this union with God is for Clement only the Church, though Christ's way. The communication goodness operated in the creation of the gnosis is bound up with holy ordersworld, which give the divine light Son himself was immutable, self-sufficient, and lifeincapable of suffering. The simple faith of the baptized Christian contains all According to his interpretation, such are the essentials characteristic qualities of the highest knowledge; by divine essence. Though the Eucharist the believer Logos is united most closely one with the Logos Father, whose powers he resumes in himself, to Clement both the Son and the Spiritare "first-born powers and first created"; they form the highest stages in the scale of intelligent being, and made partaker Clement distinguishes the Son-Logos from the Logos who is immutably immanent in God. Because of incorruptibility. Though this [[Photius the Great|Photius]] would later charge that he lays down at starting "degraded the Son to the rank of a purely spiritual conception creature." Separate from the world as the principle of creation, the Logos is yet in it as its guiding principle. Thus a natural life is a life according to the Church, later will of the exigencies Logos. Clement has also been accused of [[Docetism]] in his controversy with the Gnostics make him lay more stress teachings on the visible church[[Incarnation]]. As According to his use of Scripturehim, the extraordinary breadth body of his reading and manifold variety of his quotations Christ was not subject to human needs. See the following passage from ''Stromateis'' which clearly denies Christ's full humanity::''In regard to the most diverse authors make Savior, however, it very difficult were ridiculous to determine exactly what was received as canonical by the Alexandrian Church of suppose that period. Though he uses the Apocryphal Gospelsbody demanded, as a body, our four alone have supreme authority the necessary aids for him'':''its maintenance. For He ate, note for the sake of the other [[New Testament]] writings he seems not body, which had its continuance from a holy power, but lest those'':''in His company might happen to have think otherwise of Him, just as aftewards some did certainily supposed that He had appeared'':''as definite a line of demarcationmere phantasm. He was in general dispassionate; but whatever he recognized as and no movement of apostolic origin had for him an authority distinct fromfeeling penetrated Him, and higher than, that of all other ecclesiastical traditionwhether pleasure:''or pain.''{{ref|2}}
An excerpt from Instead, Clement's Christ is a supernatural physician; He is not subject to humanity's bodily pain. The medicine which he offers is the communication of saving ''Mar Saba lettergnosis'', attributed leading men from paganism to faith and from faith to Clement the higher state of knowledge. This true philosophy includes within itself the freedom from sin and the attainment of Alexandriavirtue. As all sin has its root in ignorance, so the knowledge of God and of goodness is followed by well-doing. Against the only evidence Gnostics Clement emphasizes the freedom of all to do good (for which he has also been called Semi-Pelagian). Also, some have downplayed Clement's influence on the Church: "Clement has had no notable influence on the existence course of a possible theology beyond his personal influence on the young Origen"{{ref|1}}.  ==Quote==:''Secret Gospel The Word of MarkGod, became man just that you may learn from a Man how it may be that man should become god.''.
==External links==
*[http://www.piney.com/MuClement.html#P2694_785619 "Exhortation to the Heathens", by Clement of Alexandria]
*[http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/clement-stromata-book1.html "The Stromata, or MiscellenariesMiscellanies", by Clement of Alexandria]
*[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0209.htm "The Paedagogus", by Clement of Alexandria]
* {{note|1}}[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04045a.htm CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Clement of Alexandria]* [http://www.coptic.net/articles/ClementOfAlexandria.txt Clement of Alexandria {(CoptNet article)]* [http://www.stathanasius.miss.on.coptorthodox.ca/Menu/Patrology/SchoolOfAlexandria/DeansClement.htm The Deans of the School of Alexandria - St. Clement]
* [http://www.earlychurch.org.uk/clementalex.php Clement of Alexandria @ EarlyChurch.org.uk]
* [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/clement.html Online Text for Clement of Alexandria]
----
'''Sources:'''
* This article includes text from the Schaff-Herzog ''Encyclopedia of Religion''
* http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clement_of_Alexandria&oldid=62671929
* {{note|2}} From Jurgens, William A., ''The Faith of the Early Fathers, Volume 1.''Collegeville, MN:The Liturgical Press, pg. 184. Copyright 1970, The Order of Saint Benedict, Inc., Collegeville, MN. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN 0-8146-0432-3.
[[Category:Church Fathers]]
[[Category:TheologiansSaints]][[Category:Ante-Nicene Fathers]][[Category:Ante-Nicene Saints]][[Category:3rd-century saints]] [[ro:Clement al Alexandriei]]

Navigation menu