User talk:Joe Rodgers

From OrthodoxWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Church Calendar, etc.)
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== IRC ==
+
== [[Deanery]] ==
  
Thanks to Kevin Basil, I can be found quite often in the #orthodoxy channel on lplug.org. Talk to me there if you would like. I go by the name, WPU.
+
Were you aware that your source (La Crosse) is Roman Catholic?  I don't know whether it makes any difference in the definition of a deanery, but I thought I should point it out anyway. {{User:Magda/sig}} 07:41, January 19, 2006 (CST)
  
Don't know about IRC? You could learn [http://blog.kevinbasil.com/2003/02/03/holy-irc-batman/ if you want].
+
:Yes I was. I am certainly not against Catholic, Protestant, or anything for that matter, when it coincides with truth. I was not able to find a reasonable online source from an Orthodox perspective and thought that these words were appropriate for Orthodox deaneries as well. [[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe]] 20060119
  
== Talk pages ==
+
== Pic ==
  
I don't much mind what you do with your own Talk page, but would you mind not erasing those of other articles?  It's helpful to see where we've been and why we've done what we've done. 
+
Nice to see you Joe! {{User:FrJohn/sig}}
  
(Please forgive me if I seem needling and nagging.) —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 17:47, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
+
And you know, somehow I thought you were older than you appear to be.  :{{User:ASDamick/sig}} 16:39, January 19, 2006 (CST)
  
: I will gladly abide by the decision of the sysops. What is everyone else's opinion? I talked with another sysop (I won't mention their name) who seemed to agree that things get a little cluttered, cloudy, or outdated in discussion pages.
+
== Menologion ==
 +
Joe, this is Aleks. I got you message recently. Can you elaborate in an e-mail on what exactly you're interested in making? I think it would be great to have Menologion and OW work together, but I want to figure out the logistics first.
  
: My own thoughts are that if articles can be trimmed and made more concise, why can't talk pages? I like having an archive, but if a situation has been addressed then I personally think it makes things cluttered to keep them around. The discussion is archived in the changelog/history. My two cents. --[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 18:54, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
+
== Hi ==
 +
Dear Joe, Thanks (belatedly) for your welcome note!
 +
Best, [[User:Maxim|Maxim]] 12:39, June 28, 2006 (CDT)
  
Wikipedia's usual approach (not that we have to do everything they do) is to make archival subpages when the given talk page gets too long.  Sorting through a history can be extremely difficult and time consuming, especially if one isn't looking for something in particular but rather simply wants to know what the discussion regarding a given article has been.
+
== Your sig ==
  
I don't think this has ever been discussed between the sysopsI'm just ''one'' of them and by no means chief among them.  We can certainly put it up for discussion, though, which I've done on [[OrthodoxWiki:Administrators]].  —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 19:09, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
+
I've noticed that your sig isn't coming out quite right when you sign postsIf you want to use the template approach, you'll need to check the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box in your preferences on the "User profile" tab.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font color="blue"><b><i>Dcn. Andrew</i></b></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Randompage|<font color="blue">random</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</sup> 15:23, August 10, 2006 (CDT)
  
:I think one reason to keep a record of resolved issues is that others who think of similar (or the same) issues can see for themselves that it has been resolved, without having to rehash arguments, for instance when a style decision has been made. —[[User:Magda|magda]] 20:27, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
+
== IRC Channel still up? ==
 
+
:: Good point Magda. However, I think that if the style decision is explicit enough it could detail the reasons why a decision was made over another. --[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 20:59, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
+
 
+
== Re: Patron Saint ==
+
 
+
It's a good question, Joe. I'm not sure who that would be. Let me think about this some more. I don't think we should change the name of the site to "St. so-and-so Orthodox Encyclopedia", but I wouldn't be adverse to seeking the intercession of an appropriate patron. Do you or others have any suggestions? [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]]
+
 
+
== "God the..." redirects ==
+
  
 
Hi Joe,
 
Hi Joe,
  
Another comment... It strikes me that in Orthodox theology, it is not so common to refer to Jesus as "God the Son" or the Holy Spirit as "God the Holy Spirit." There is a good reason for this, too. According to Orthodox Trinitarian theology as I learnt it, "God" is not so much identified with the essence held in common by the three persons, but more properly identified with God the Father, from whom both the Son and the Holy Spirit receive their divinity. This is why, e.g., in the Creed, Jesus is "God from God" and God the Father is so often refered to in our liturgy as "the unorginate Father" or "the Father without beginning" (the Son and the Holy Spirit are originate, not in time, but ontologically, albeit not in a way that makes their divinity any lesser). 
+
I just checked up on the IRC channel and I received the following messages:
 
+
:ChanServ changed this room to require operator status to change the topic. (11:46AM)<br>
My suggestion would be to remove the redirects. I don't think they're really necessary, and even if another article links to the phrase "God the..." it would be easy enough just to make the words link directly to the main page in question. - [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] 14:09, 4 Jul 2005 (EDT)
+
[11:46AM] ChanServ made this room no longer a secret. (11:46AM) <br>
 
+
[11:46AM] You were demoted from operator by ChanServ. (11:46AM) <br>
P.S. When are you becoming Orthodox? :-)
+
 
+
:: Thank you Father. I think you make a very good point. Please feel free to remove the redirects (I don't know if I am allowed). I am building the [[Template:Orthodoxchristianity|introduction]] article and am looking for any suggestions you could give. I guess it would be good to eventually do a search for "God the.." and make sure the links are pointing in the right directions. Thanks for your help. Quite a question you pose there at the end. --[[User:Joe Rodgers|{{User:Joe Rodgers/sig}}]] 14:16, 4 Jul 2005 (EDT)
+
  
== [[:Category:Church Life]] ==
+
Given my IRC inexperience, maybe this is nothing to worry about - just normal, but I wanted to make sure our channel is still up and running in good standing, not quashed due to inactivity. What is the freenode policy on this?
  
My concern about the [[:Category:Church Life|Church Life]] category is that it could logically end up getting used for absolutely everything, which would make it useless as a category.  Ideally, every article should be in a category, but some just don't quite seem to fit into the more obvious categories (e.g., Liturgics, Church History, etc.), so the Church Life category was created.
+
Thanks! — [[User:FrJohn|<b>FrJohn</b>]] ([http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/User_talk:FrJohn&action=edit&section=new talk]) 09:49, May 26, 2007 (PDT)
  
I have read the discussion in the category Talk, but I honestly wasn't sure what was being suggested, especially because there weren't already articles already existing to put into the categories (which is what [[User:Magda|Magda]] seemed to be saying, too).  My own philosophy WRT categories is that they should be created to include an actual group of developed articles, probably at least three.
+
== Active appeal ==
  
A category for "Home Life" (as opposed to "Church Life") also seems, well, secularist&mdash;i.e., at least ''suggesting'' that what was going on at one's home was in some sense not "Church."
+
There's currently an active appeal over at [[OrthodoxWiki talk:Administrators]].  If as an admin, you would like to participate, please feel free to do so.  Thanks!  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 16:01, August 19, 2008 (UTC)
  
I'm going to copy this, with some editing, over to the Category Talk page.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 11:49, 5 Jul 2005 (EDT)
 
  
== Church Calendar, etc. ==
+
== Hi, I'm Italian ==
  
Well, it's something (I think) I know how to do, and I like getting familiar with the saints' names. (Did I mention I love having a job with internet access and free time?)  I'm glad you're enjoying my busyness. I took a break after finishing June and the first week of July, and thought it would be nice to finish July before [[User:Vandrona|my husband]] and I go on vacation. —[[User:Magda|magda]] 16:05, 6 Jul 2005 (EDT)
+
I hope in Orthodox in Italian... i'll writing in Italian... about Ortodossia!!

Latest revision as of 05:25, January 19, 2011

Contents

Deanery

Were you aware that your source (La Crosse) is Roman Catholic? I don't know whether it makes any difference in the definition of a deanery, but I thought I should point it out anyway. —magda (talk) 07:41, January 19, 2006 (CST)

Yes I was. I am certainly not against Catholic, Protestant, or anything for that matter, when it coincides with truth. I was not able to find a reasonable online source from an Orthodox perspective and thought that these words were appropriate for Orthodox deaneries as well. Joe 20060119

Pic

Nice to see you Joe! — FrJohn (talk)

And you know, somehow I thought you were older than you appear to be.  :) —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 16:39, January 19, 2006 (CST)

Menologion

Joe, this is Aleks. I got you message recently. Can you elaborate in an e-mail on what exactly you're interested in making? I think it would be great to have Menologion and OW work together, but I want to figure out the logistics first.

Hi

Dear Joe, Thanks (belatedly) for your welcome note! Best, Maxim 12:39, June 28, 2006 (CDT)

Your sig

I've noticed that your sig isn't coming out quite right when you sign posts. If you want to use the template approach, you'll need to check the "Raw signatures (without automatic link)" box in your preferences on the "User profile" tab. —Dcn. Andrew talk random contribs 15:23, August 10, 2006 (CDT)

IRC Channel still up?

Hi Joe,

I just checked up on the IRC channel and I received the following messages:

ChanServ changed this room to require operator status to change the topic. (11:46AM)

[11:46AM] ChanServ made this room no longer a secret. (11:46AM)
[11:46AM] You were demoted from operator by ChanServ. (11:46AM)

Given my IRC inexperience, maybe this is nothing to worry about - just normal, but I wanted to make sure our channel is still up and running in good standing, not quashed due to inactivity. What is the freenode policy on this?

Thanks! — FrJohn (talk) 09:49, May 26, 2007 (PDT)

Active appeal

There's currently an active appeal over at OrthodoxWiki talk:Administrators. If as an admin, you would like to participate, please feel free to do so. Thanks! —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 16:01, August 19, 2008 (UTC)


Hi, I'm Italian

I hope in Orthodox in Italian... i'll writing in Italian... about Ortodossia!!

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox