Difference between revisions of "User talk:Joe Rodgers"
Joe Rodgers (talk | contribs) m (Added a timestamp) |
(→Style Manual mirrors?) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
: Using the term "mirror," in retrospect, may not have been the best idea. The whole purpose of creating the "mirror" was to hopefully provide a new home for aspects of the Style Manual that could be placed in their own module. Again, I apologize. I certainly believe in uniformity and consisentcy. It is not my intention to thwart the purposes of the sysops or to be a renegade editor.--[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 12:46, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT) | : Using the term "mirror," in retrospect, may not have been the best idea. The whole purpose of creating the "mirror" was to hopefully provide a new home for aspects of the Style Manual that could be placed in their own module. Again, I apologize. I certainly believe in uniformity and consisentcy. It is not my intention to thwart the purposes of the sysops or to be a renegade editor.--[[User:Joe Rodgers|Joe Rodgers]] 12:46, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't see a problem with breaking it up into modular sections. In the future, though, please ''propose'' such a significant change before taking the initiative. Something like this really needs to have the administration on board. —[[User:ASDamick|{{User:ASDamick/sig}}]] 12:56, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:56, June 28, 2005
Style Manual mirrors?
I must confess that I don't understand why you've created mirrors of sections of the style manual. The reason that OrthodoxWiki:Style Manual is protected (not publicly editable) is because it's essentially the work and purview of the administration. I'm concerned that these editable mirrors, besides creating dfficulties keeping all relevant mirrors updated, may potentially engender some confusion regarding what the official standards are.
If there's something you'd like added in or changed, you can certainly address it on OrthodoxWiki Talk:Style Manual. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 07:55, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- I realized I was risking offending or causing concern. I sincerely apologize. My response is to the fact that the Style Manual is really long and could probably benefit from being modularized. I, for one, get lost in a long sea of text. Having the Style Manual broken up, as a series would prevent from having to scroll up and down as much.
- Wikipedia uses a somewhat similar approach for their Manual of Style by creating supplementary pages to their style guide. For instance, they have a page to discuss the styling for biographies, similar to the fact that we have styling that has to do with the way people articles should be written.
- Using the term "mirror," in retrospect, may not have been the best idea. The whole purpose of creating the "mirror" was to hopefully provide a new home for aspects of the Style Manual that could be placed in their own module. Again, I apologize. I certainly believe in uniformity and consisentcy. It is not my intention to thwart the purposes of the sysops or to be a renegade editor.--Joe Rodgers 12:46, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
I don't see a problem with breaking it up into modular sections. In the future, though, please propose such a significant change before taking the initiative. Something like this really needs to have the administration on board. —[[User:ASDamick|—Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!)]] 12:56, 28 Jun 2005 (EDT)
