User talk:Fr Lev

From OrthodoxWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Wikipedia article: new section)
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Texte gras'''ECOF
+
== [[Talk:Liturgy of St. Tikhon of Moscow]] ==
Fr, are you a member of ECOF ?
+
I don't want to polemicate with you.
+
But concerning divorce, Germain never produced the judgement, nor the new civil state of his "ex" wife. It would be prooves,no ? That's not the problem.
+
Germain always refused to go in Bucaresti for the trial. From 1991 to 1993...
+
The only romanian priest I know to have spent a time in France in ECOF, after 1993, had been himself deposed (not for this) and had left ECOF .
+
I don't want to hurt you in your faith or opinions. For you ECOF is canonical, and so on.
+
I just believe, regarding the situation in France,that is clear: every canonical diocese is represented by his Bishop in the AEOF, it is not fair to let people believe ECOF is an orthodox Church, canonical and autonom.
+
It is hiding the truth not to tell that ECOF is outside the Orthodox comunion.
+
Isn't it true ? With which Orthodox Church ECOF is in communion ?
+
Can a church exist with only one bishop, outside all form of synod, and canonical links with the Orthodox Church in all countries ? Orthodox canonical law permits this?
+
Why won't you then stand me to write ECOF is now a diocese of western rite, without links and communion with the Orthodox Church in France ? Is that polemical ?
+
  
   
+
I've rolled the Talk page back, as per your request. &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 01:56, August 6, 2008 (UTC)
  
 +
Many thanks! --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 02:04, August 6, 2008 (UTC)
  
  
 +
== Edits to Great Schism ==
  
 +
Fr.
  
 +
With all due respect, the form of date 1054 A.D. is correct english. I don't understand the edit.
  
Fr Lev., bless. I am from Romanian Orthodox Church, and I've been part of all these events with ECOF. I've all documents, and met all protagonists. All informations are true: you want more details ?
+
Jaye (Jacifus)
In France, you can ask every canonical jurisdiction about this. More, you can obtain informations from the Romanian Mitropolia.
+
Gilles Bertrand Hardy was married with Constance (Nathalie) de Castelbajac in 1995. Still live with her. Have you seen the divorce judgement ? NO.It doesn't exist.
+
Romanian documents (1993 and 2001)states that Germain is deposed, and reduced to laity state. You can check. Every Church follow these decision, by refusing communion with him and his clergy.
+
You probably know there are even worst things to say...
+
You must allow me to write Romanian Church considers Germain deposed, and in France ECOF is non-canonical. We can write that ECOF is not ok with that, considers itself as an autocephal orthodox church, but facts are here.
+
I join comments from french quality websites like orthodoxie.com.
+
Please to meet you, from wich Church are you ?
+
Forgive me and pray for me
+
  
 +
: Following Latin, the more traditional syntax is to place ''AD'' before the number (e.g., AD 1054), though the reverse is now becoming more common.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 22:38, December 4, 2008 (UTC)
  
 +
The ''Chicago Manual of Style'' indicates that AD should be used without periods and should precede the year. ''Anno Domini'' means "in the year of our Lord," so it would look odd to write "1054 in the year of our Lord." Personally, I would prefer using "CE" instead of "AD." As scholars agree that Christ was born in or around 4 BCE, it seems very odd to have to say that Christ was born "four years Before Christ." --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 01:34, December 5, 2008 (UTC)
  
==Email...==
+
==Talk:Sarum Use==
Hi Fr. Lev! Hope you don't mind that I changed around your email a little bit. It's amazing how quickly a raw email address put in the web can bring in loads of spam. Still planning to respond to your email from months ago - someday! Yours in Christ, {{User:FrJohn/sig}}
+
Hello Fr,
 +
I was trying to add some comments to this page, and when i tried to save it removed all existing comments. Tried to undo the revision, and the undo did not save. Not able to restore,,can you please help?? Thanks,
 +
[[User:Angellight 888|Angellight 888]] 20:51, August 26, 2008 (UTC)
  
Thanks! --[[User:Fr Lev|Fr Lev]] 17:58, May 25, 2006 (CDT)
+
==Help on [[misotheism]] article==
 +
Hello Father I was hoping for some help on the misotheism article.
 +
[[User:LoveMonkey|LoveMonkey]] 17:08, August 30, 2008 (UTC)
  
==[[Vladimir Lossky]]==
+
== Wikipedia article ==
Not so much: there was an article created under [[Lossky]] and I amalgamated the two articles; hence, if anything, the source was the new article.  Additionally, I didn't see any controversial points (aside from the criticism section, which is always going to be at least a little controversial).  You may need to ask the editor of the Lossky article (see the page history); but feel free to place the [[Template:Reference|<nowiki>{{reference}}</nowiki>]] template there on as many disputed points as you can find. &mdash; edited by [[User:Pistevo|<font color="green">Pιs</font><font color="gold">τévο</font>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Pistevo|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'' ''[[User talk:Pistevo/dev/null|<font color="red">complaints</font>]]''</sup> at 15:56, August 3, 2006 (CDT)
+
  
==[[Vladimir Lossky]] follow up ==
+
Hi.  Thanks so much for contributing yesterday on the Wikipedia talk page for "Catholic–Eastern Orthodox theological differences". I hope we could convince you (and others) to join in further over there, especially in the "discussion" (?) that has been going on regarding the nature of the physical human body. There are really only two editors "working (?) on this article right now, and they're mostly locked in an edit war over the writings of Vladimir Lossky and whether his view (essentially, as I understand it, that our material bodies didn't exist before the fall and won't exist after the resurrection) represents mainstream Orthodox belief or not. I've got a nagging suspicion that this may be a "creative" interpretation of what the Apostle Paul meant when he talked about the resurrection in I Corinthians 15 — but I fear there isn't much hope for a solution on Wikipedia unless we can get more knowledgeable Orthodox (or at least Orthodoxy-knowledgeable) people involved on the article — something that just doesn't seem to be happening so far.  [[User:Richwales|Richwales]] 03:55, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
God bless you Father Lev for your correction on the Lossky page.
+
[[User:LoveMonkey|LoveMonkey]] 23:07, September 23, 2006 (CDT)
+
 
+
== theosis ==
+
Hey would it be appropriate to intergrate henosis into the theosis article?
+
[[User:LoveMonkey|LoveMonkey]] 23:10, September 23, 2006 (CDT)
+
 
+
{{imgdel}} &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]</small> 11:30, March 16, 2007 (PDT)
+

Latest revision as of 20:55, August 30, 2010

Contents

Talk:Liturgy of St. Tikhon of Moscow

I've rolled the Talk page back, as per your request. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 01:56, August 6, 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks! --Fr Lev 02:04, August 6, 2008 (UTC)


Edits to Great Schism

Fr.

With all due respect, the form of date 1054 A.D. is correct english. I don't understand the edit.

Jaye (Jacifus)

Following Latin, the more traditional syntax is to place AD before the number (e.g., AD 1054), though the reverse is now becoming more common. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 22:38, December 4, 2008 (UTC)

The Chicago Manual of Style indicates that AD should be used without periods and should precede the year. Anno Domini means "in the year of our Lord," so it would look odd to write "1054 in the year of our Lord." Personally, I would prefer using "CE" instead of "AD." As scholars agree that Christ was born in or around 4 BCE, it seems very odd to have to say that Christ was born "four years Before Christ." --Fr Lev 01:34, December 5, 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Sarum Use

Hello Fr, I was trying to add some comments to this page, and when i tried to save it removed all existing comments. Tried to undo the revision, and the undo did not save. Not able to restore,,can you please help?? Thanks, Angellight 888 20:51, August 26, 2008 (UTC)

Help on misotheism article

Hello Father I was hoping for some help on the misotheism article. LoveMonkey 17:08, August 30, 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia article

Hi. Thanks so much for contributing yesterday on the Wikipedia talk page for "Catholic–Eastern Orthodox theological differences". I hope we could convince you (and others) to join in further over there, especially in the "discussion" (?) that has been going on regarding the nature of the physical human body. There are really only two editors "working (?) on this article right now, and they're mostly locked in an edit war over the writings of Vladimir Lossky and whether his view (essentially, as I understand it, that our material bodies didn't exist before the fall and won't exist after the resurrection) represents mainstream Orthodox belief or not. I've got a nagging suspicion that this may be a "creative" interpretation of what the Apostle Paul meant when he talked about the resurrection in I Corinthians 15 — but I fear there isn't much hope for a solution on Wikipedia unless we can get more knowledgeable Orthodox (or at least Orthodoxy-knowledgeable) people involved on the article — something that just doesn't seem to be happening so far. Richwales 03:55, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox