Typology

From OrthodoxWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(ro)
m (link)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
==Distinction between Typology and Allegory==
 
==Distinction between Typology and Allegory==
 +
[[Image:Burning bush, (Damaskinos).jpg|right|thumb|The [[Theotokos]] with the Burning Bush. (''[[Michael Damaskinos|Damaskinos]], 16th c.'')]]
 +
Typology stresses the connection between actual persons, events, places, and institutions of the Old Testament, and their corresponding reality in the New Testament which they foreshadowed.<ref>Fr. John Breck, ''Scripture in Tradition: The Bible and it Interpretation in the Orthodox Church'' (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir Seminary Press, 2001) p.22f.</ref>  Moses the Lawgiver foreshadows Christ, the ultimate Lawgiver.  [[Aaron]], the High priest, foreshadows Christ, the ultimate High Priest.  [[Manna]], which fed the people in the wilderness foreshadows the Christ the Heavenly Bread (the [[Eucharist]]), which provides ultimate spiritual nourishment. The [[Burning Bush]] foreshadows the [[Theotokos]].
  
Typology stresses the connection between actual persons, events, places, and institutions of the Old Testament, and their corresponding reality in the New Testament which they foreshadowed.<ref>Fr. John Breck, ''Scripture in Tradition: The Bible and it Interpretation in the Orthodox Church'' (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir Seminary Press, 2001) p.22f.</ref>  Moses the Lawgiver foreshadows Christ, the ultimate Lawgiver.  [[Aaron]], the High priest, foreshadows Christ, the ultimate High Priest.  [[Manna]], which fed the people in the wilderness foreshadows the Christ the Heavenly Bread (the [[Eucharist]]), which provides ultimate spiritual nourishment.  Allegory, on the other hand, finds hidden or symbolic meaning in the Old Testament, which is inherent in text and does not depend on a future historical fulfillment; for example, I Corinthians 9:8-10 sees the law forbidding the muzzling of an ox while it treads the corn as having the hidden meaning that a minister of the Gospel should be supported by the people he ministers to. The [[Song of Solomon]] is also often interpreted as an allegory of God (the Lover), and His love for His people (the beloved). The allegorical approach also often sees multiple correspondences in a given narrative which illustrate some point.  For example, St. Paul explicitly uses allegory in [[Galatians]] 4, in which he sees the child of the slave woman ([[Hagar]]) as representing those under the Law, while the child of the free woman ([[Sarah]]) as representing those under the New Covenant, and the casting out of Hagar and [[Ishmael]] as representing the inferiority of the Old Covenant to the New (Galatians 4:21-31).
+
Allegory, on the other hand, finds hidden or symbolic meaning in the Old Testament, which is inherent in text and does not depend on a future historical fulfillment; for example, I Corinthians 9:8-10 sees the law forbidding the muzzling of an ox while it treads the corn as having the hidden meaning that a minister of the Gospel should be supported by the people he ministers to. The [[Song of Solomon]] is also often interpreted as an allegory of God (the Lover), and His love for His people (the beloved). The allegorical approach also often sees multiple correspondences in a given narrative which illustrate some point.  For example, St. Paul explicitly uses allegory in [[Galatians]] 4, in which he sees the child of the slave woman ([[Hagar]]) as representing those under the Law, while the child of the free woman ([[Sarah]]) as representing those under the New Covenant, and the casting out of Hagar and [[Ishmael]] as representing the inferiority of the Old Covenant to the New (Galatians 4:21-31).
  
 
==Sources==
 
==Sources==
Line 47: Line 49:
 
*[http://www.theopedia.com/Biblical_typology Biblical Typology]. At Theopedia.
 
*[http://www.theopedia.com/Biblical_typology Biblical Typology]. At Theopedia.
 
*[http://books.google.ca/books?id=zD6xVr1CizIC&pg=PA792&lpg=PA792&dq=biblical+christian+typologies&source=web&ots=03BSdOPF1q&sig=WP40ldWTq6tmtIk1QXIrgxhx_Wo&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature] by David L. Jeffrey. Published by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1992.  ISBN 9780802836342
 
*[http://books.google.ca/books?id=zD6xVr1CizIC&pg=PA792&lpg=PA792&dq=biblical+christian+typologies&source=web&ots=03BSdOPF1q&sig=WP40ldWTq6tmtIk1QXIrgxhx_Wo&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature] by David L. Jeffrey. Published by Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1992.  ISBN 9780802836342
 
+
*[http://www.bible-researcher.com/type.html Typology of Scripture], by William G. Moorehead
 +
*[http://www.bible-researcher.com/fritsch.html Biblical Typology], by Charles T. Fritsch
 +
*Fr. Georges A. Barrois. [http://www.amazon.com/Face-Christ-Old-Testament/dp/0913836222 The Face of Christ in the Old Testament]. [[St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary (Crestwood, New York)|St Vladimirs Seminary Press]], January 1997. 172pp. ISBN 9780913836224
  
 
[[Category:Scripture]]
 
[[Category:Scripture]]
  
 
[[ro:Tipologie]]
 
[[ro:Tipologie]]

Latest revision as of 19:28, December 29, 2011

Typology is an approach to the interpretation of the Scriptures found in the New Testament itself, and in the writings of the Church Fathers, which sees certain people and events in the Old Testament (Types) as foreshadowing things fulfilled in the New Testament (Antitypes). This is related, but distinct from allegory.

The Fathers believed that Scripture had different levels of meaning, which included the literal or historical sense of the text, but could also have an allegorical meaning, or a typological meaning. A text also has a tropological or moral sense, and an anagogical or mystical sense. That a text had an allegorical or typological meaning did not negate the historical sense of the text, it was simply another way of understanding the text.[1]

Typological interpretations of Old Testament events and persons saw them as prefigurations of the events of Christ's life, or other aspects of the New Testament. We find this approach expressed by the Apostle Paul in Colossians 2:16-17: "Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ." It also finds expression in the Epistle to the Hebrews, and in other Epistles.

One example of typology is the story of Jonah and the whale from the Old Testament. Typological interpretations of this story hold that it prefigures Christ's burial, the stomach of the fish being Christ's tomb: as Jonah was freed from the whale after three days, so did Christ rise from His tomb after three days, see also Matthew 12:38–42, Matthew 16:1–4, Luke 11:29–32. Indeed, Jonah called the belly of the fish "Sheol," the land of the dead.

Other examples of types in the Bible:

  • While in the wilderness, Moses put a brazen serpent (a symbol of evil) on a pole which would heal anyone bitten by a snake who looked at it (Numbers 21:8). Jesus proclaimed that the serpent was a type of Himself, since "as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up" (John 3:14) and "For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." (II Corinthians 5:21)
  • In a battle with the Amalekites, Exodus 17:11 states that "[a]s long as Moses held up his hands, the Israelites were winning, but whenever he lowered his hands, the Amalekites were winning." Commentators interpret Moses' raised hands as a type of Jesus' raised hands upon the Cross, for when Jesus' hands were raised as He died, a figurative battle with sin was waged, the end result being victory—that "all will be made alive." (I Cor. 15:22)

Contents

Old Testament Types

Genesis, chapters 37 through 50, brings us the story of Joseph in Egypt. Joseph is commonly cited as a Christ type in the story.[2] Joseph is the only son (at that time) of his mother and a very special son to his father. From his father's perspective Joseph dies and then comes back to life as the ruler of Egypt. Actually Joseph's brothers deceive their father by dipping his coat in the blood of a sacrificed animal. Later Joseph's father finds that not only is Joseph alive but he also is the ruler of Egypt who saves the world of his day from a great famine. Other parallels between Joseph and Jesus include, both are betrayed for silver, both are falsely accused and face false witnesses.

Moses, like Joseph and Jonah, undergoes a symbolic death and resurrection. Moses is placed in a basket and floated down the Nile river, and then is drawn out of the Nile to be adopted as a prince. The baby Moses was under a death sentence. Interestingly, floating the body down the Nile river was part of an Egyptian funerary ritual for royalty.[3]

Genesis Chapter 22 brings us the story of the preempted sacrifice of Isaac. God asks Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac to Him, cited as a foreshadowing of God sacrificing His Son. When a suspicious Isaac asked his father, "Where is the lamb for the burnt offering?" Abraham prophesied, "God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son." And indeed a ram caught by its horns awaited them. In the larger picture Christ is ultimately the lamb Whom God provides for the sacrifice in this typology.

In the New Testament, Jesus actually invokes Jonah as type: "As the crowds increased, Jesus said, 'This is a wicked generation. It asks for a miraculous sign, but none will be given it except the sign of Jonah' " (Luke 11:29). In the Old Testament Jonah told the men aboard the ship to sacrifice him by throwing him overboard. Jonah told them that by taking his life, God's wrath would pass and the sea would become calm. Jonah then spends three days and nights in the belly of a great fish before he is spit up onto dry land. This parallel to Jesus' three days and nights in the grave for the typology.

The Jewish Tabernacle is commonly seen as a series of complex types of Jesus Christ: for example, Jesus describes himself as "the door"[4], and the only "way" to God [5], represented in the single, wide gate to the tabernacle court; the various layers of coverings over the tabernacle represent Christ's godliness (in the intricately-woven inner covering) and his humanity (in the dull colouring of the outside covering)[6]

The Ark of Noah is seen as a type of Baptism in I Peter 3:18-22. Just as the Ark of Noah saved Noah and his family, "There is also an antitype which now saves us—baptism..." (I Peter 3:21).

Distinction between Typology and Allegory

The Theotokos with the Burning Bush. (Damaskinos, 16th c.)

Typology stresses the connection between actual persons, events, places, and institutions of the Old Testament, and their corresponding reality in the New Testament which they foreshadowed.[7] Moses the Lawgiver foreshadows Christ, the ultimate Lawgiver. Aaron, the High priest, foreshadows Christ, the ultimate High Priest. Manna, which fed the people in the wilderness foreshadows the Christ the Heavenly Bread (the Eucharist), which provides ultimate spiritual nourishment. The Burning Bush foreshadows the Theotokos.

Allegory, on the other hand, finds hidden or symbolic meaning in the Old Testament, which is inherent in text and does not depend on a future historical fulfillment; for example, I Corinthians 9:8-10 sees the law forbidding the muzzling of an ox while it treads the corn as having the hidden meaning that a minister of the Gospel should be supported by the people he ministers to. The Song of Solomon is also often interpreted as an allegory of God (the Lover), and His love for His people (the beloved). The allegorical approach also often sees multiple correspondences in a given narrative which illustrate some point. For example, St. Paul explicitly uses allegory in Galatians 4, in which he sees the child of the slave woman (Hagar) as representing those under the Law, while the child of the free woman (Sarah) as representing those under the New Covenant, and the casting out of Hagar and Ishmael as representing the inferiority of the Old Covenant to the New (Galatians 4:21-31).

Sources

Some material in this article is taken from the Wikipedia article Typology (theology)

Notes

  1. Meaning or Meanings of Scripture? Fr. John Breck, OrthodoxyToday.org
  2. Joseph Sold Into Slavery
  3. Solar Boat/Funerary Boat of Cheops (Khufu) Boats of Ancient Egypt Exhibit Life in Ancient Egypt. See Ancient Egyptian burial customs.
  4. John 10:9
  5. John14:6
  6. CH Raven, God's Sanctuary, John Ritchie Ltd., 1991, ISBN 9780946351312
  7. Fr. John Breck, Scripture in Tradition: The Bible and it Interpretation in the Orthodox Church (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir Seminary Press, 2001) p.22f.

External links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox
In other languages