Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vitaly (Ustinov) of New York"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Well, please change it for us, then. And don't forgot to sign your comments (using four tildes, or the squiggly ~ marks). [[User:Gabriela|Gabriela]] 22:40, September 22, 2006 (CDT) | :Well, please change it for us, then. And don't forgot to sign your comments (using four tildes, or the squiggly ~ marks). [[User:Gabriela|Gabriela]] 22:40, September 22, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| − | Personally, I'm for removing the reference to ROCE all together. What do others think? | + | Personally, I'm for removing the reference to ROCE all together. What do others think? My reasoning is that Metropolitan Vitaly never served as "First Hierarch" of "ROCiE"; a group of people used his name on ROCiE documents. |
--[[User:Aleks|Aleks]] 21:01, September 25, 2006 (CDT) | --[[User:Aleks|Aleks]] 21:01, September 25, 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:01, September 26, 2006
Technically speaking, Metropolitan Vitaly is no longer the "First Hierarch" of "ROCiE", since after a shuffle and scuffle at Mansonville he was "replaced" by Nikita (Orloff), alias "Archbishop" Anthony.
- Well, please change it for us, then. And don't forgot to sign your comments (using four tildes, or the squiggly ~ marks). Gabriela 22:40, September 22, 2006 (CDT)
Personally, I'm for removing the reference to ROCE all together. What do others think? My reasoning is that Metropolitan Vitaly never served as "First Hierarch" of "ROCiE"; a group of people used his name on ROCiE documents.
--Aleks 21:01, September 25, 2006 (CDT)
