Difference between revisions of "Talk:Upcoming Feast days"

From OrthodoxWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: This "article" is titled "Upcoming Feast days" yet no dates are mentioned nor is the question answered of ''what upcoming feast days?'' are up coming. The text on the saints mentioned in t...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This "article" is titled "Upcoming Feast days" yet no dates are mentioned nor is the question answered of ''what upcoming feast days?'' are up coming. The text on the saints mentioned in the article should be part of individual articles, if they are not already present, and this article should then be deleted.[[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 22:18, December 13, 2008 (UTC)
 
This "article" is titled "Upcoming Feast days" yet no dates are mentioned nor is the question answered of ''what upcoming feast days?'' are up coming. The text on the saints mentioned in the article should be part of individual articles, if they are not already present, and this article should then be deleted.[[User:Wsk|Wsk]] 22:18, December 13, 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
: The article is just an RSS feed from iconograms.com.  I'm not sure it's really worth syndicating here, though.  &mdash;[[User:ASDamick|<font size="3.5" color="green" face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">Fr. Andrew</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:ASDamick|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</sup> <small>[[Special:Contributions/ASDamick|<font color="black">contribs</font>]] <font face="Adobe Garamond Pro, Garamond, Georgia, Times New Roman">('''[[User:ASDamick/Wiki-philosophy|THINK!]]''')</font></small> 01:04, December 14, 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:04, December 14, 2008

This "article" is titled "Upcoming Feast days" yet no dates are mentioned nor is the question answered of what upcoming feast days? are up coming. The text on the saints mentioned in the article should be part of individual articles, if they are not already present, and this article should then be deleted.Wsk 22:18, December 13, 2008 (UTC)

The article is just an RSS feed from iconograms.com. I'm not sure it's really worth syndicating here, though. —Fr. Andrew talk contribs (THINK!) 01:04, December 14, 2008 (UTC)