Talk:Theosis

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:This article has a strange emphasis and cites not-Orthodox texts as Scripture. I'm removing it and replacing it with the Wikipedia article on Theosis, which itself will need some modification. The possible source of this material was [http://church-of-the-east.org/theology/theosis.htm]. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] 15:23, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 
:This article has a strange emphasis and cites not-Orthodox texts as Scripture. I'm removing it and replacing it with the Wikipedia article on Theosis, which itself will need some modification. The possible source of this material was [http://church-of-the-east.org/theology/theosis.htm]. [[User:FrJohn|Fr. John]] 15:23, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: At first I thought this "Church of the East" might be the Nestorians, but when I looked at the front page and noticed the bit about [http://church-of-the-east.org/sacred%20sensuality/sacred_sensuality.shtml "sacred sensuality"], I became much more suspicious.  This group isn't even as Orthodox as the Nestorians.  --[[User:ASDamick|Rdr. Andrew]] 19:47, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:47, April 6, 2005

I don't think you ought to be using the term 'Yesu' here. You're writing in English and so Jesus would be more appropriate.James 08:56, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

This article has a strange emphasis and cites not-Orthodox texts as Scripture. I'm removing it and replacing it with the Wikipedia article on Theosis, which itself will need some modification. The possible source of this material was [1]. Fr. John 15:23, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
At first I thought this "Church of the East" might be the Nestorians, but when I looked at the front page and noticed the bit about "sacred sensuality", I became much more suspicious. This group isn't even as Orthodox as the Nestorians. --Rdr. Andrew 19:47, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
interaction
Donate

Please consider supporting OrthodoxWiki. FAQs

Toolbox